To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
User tono changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 29 08:37:54 +
2007 ---
@all: Finally!! The mingwport03 CWS is in the main trunk!! Now we can start the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 29 13:20:17 +
2007 ---
@vg: Thank YOU! I am checking out m207 now and I will go on to i75844.
See you
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
User vg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 22 11:08:16 +
2007 ---
vq: I'm using developer CVS for the buildbot MacPort1, it fails configure. I
have
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 22 11:22:43 +
2007 ---
@smsm1: I re-generated the configure script. Please, try new version (from the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
User tono changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
User tono changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 22 14:13:54 +
2007 ---
I have uploaded two more patches to fix build breaks in w32 MSVC build.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 21 08:00:51 +
2007 ---
Ooops, ILIB is set wrong. Sorry @vq
Index: set_soenv.in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 21 08:10:52 +
2007 ---
@vq: external/glibc-2.1.3.patch seemes to be lost in resync. Rev 1.3 is tagged
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 21 08:42:35 +
2007 ---
Unbalanced .IF in solenv.
Index: tg_lib.mk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 21 09:58:38 +
2007 ---
More unbalanced conditionals in solenv.
Index: tg_def.mk
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 21 11:40:10 +
2007 ---
Another failed resync in neon/neon.patch
Index: neon.patch
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 21 12:12:28 +
2007 ---
Although it is intended to do nothing, it will break MSVC build.
Index:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 21 12:13:47 +
2007 ---
@tono: please, please, please do NOT submit patches inline. Simply attach them,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 21 12:57:03 +
2007 ---
@vq: Sorry, I expected only a couple of build-breakers, sot this many. (I have
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 21 13:51:34 +
2007 ---
@all: Now all fixes in the cvs. Please check if everything is ok. I will start
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 21 16:21:47 +
2007 ---
Waiting for anoncvs to sync with cvs. Cannot test until that has happened ...
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 20 07:37:56 +
2007 ---
@all
With what I read, we cannot integrate this cws, and must find a solution.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 20 09:49:42 +
2007 ---
@all: today I will finish the resync and will commit fixes for MacOS build
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 20 13:28:39 +
2007 ---
@all: If the Mac build break is caused because static libraries are searched
only
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 20 13:42:23 +
2007 ---
@vq: Can you give me some time to check lost changes for mingw port itself?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 20 13:44:57 +
2007 ---
@vq: Can you take care of i#71986?
tono (Takashi Ono)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 20 14:15:51 +
2007 ---
@tono: please, wait until we get the CWS integrated, do not make any fixes for
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 20 15:00:14 +
2007 ---
@vg: Is it OK if I commit to the CWS directly? I'll only touch config_office.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 20 23:24:30 +
2007 ---
I have found the followings in the manpage of ld MaxOSX.
If a static
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 20 23:46:03 +
2007 ---
Got my system working again. The patch helps a little bit. The W32-.NET2003
build
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 19 09:39:29 +
2007 ---
@all: today I will finish resync of the CWS to the m205. Please, come up with
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 19 13:09:17 +
2007 ---
For the Mac-breakers, the order of the libraries during linking has to be
reverted
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
User maho changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
User maho changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 19 23:14:47 +
2007 ---
ericb, pjanik: this cws introduces breakage for MacOSX. Do you have an idea to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
User asrail changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 20 01:00:06 +
2007 ---
@maho: It also breaks the OOo-style W32-.NET2003-**sh build.
I looked at the diff
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 20 02:29:08 +
2007 ---
tono, vg: could you please comment on what vq says and if possible,
could you
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 16 13:23:37 +
2007 ---
the build breaker on Mac (ld failed because of symbols not found) is caused by
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 16 14:21:35 +
2007 ---
another build-breaker in binfilter/filter/source/bf_offwrp
Again reverting the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 17 00:49:44 +
2007 ---
@vq: Yes you are true. PSDK include directory is lost in SLARINC for MSVC
build.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 17 01:04:38 +
2007 ---
@cloph: I have changed the lib sequence just to emphasize the fact that these
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 15 10:24:13 +
2007 ---
@tono: good news - the cws is nominated, so will be in the main trunk in a
couple
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 15 15:26:30 +
2007 ---
It also breaks the normal W32 build, see here:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 15 15:37:26 +
2007 ---
I built the CWS for wntmsci10.pro. Can you reproduce the error?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 15 19:48:28 +
2007 ---
@vg: You probably used 4nt. Did you try using bash?
I just restarted the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 15 20:59:49 +
2007 ---
@vq: I am afraid the cws was checked with w32-tcsh build only.
tono (Takashi Ono)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 15 21:08:25 +
2007 ---
@cloph: I am a biginner with EIS. Can I see the build log of Mac build problem
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 15 21:48:14 +
2007 ---
Yes, of course you can view the logs anonymously. EIS only embeds the data from
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 16 02:00:01 +
2007 ---
I tried a W32-tcsh build, that fails too, see the tinderbox.
It probably works
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
User vg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 17 15:41:09 -0800
2006 ---
@vg: Thank you very much for your effort and help.
I will wait for QA passing.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 16 01:43:36 -0800
2006 ---
@tono: FYI I have reverted back your changes in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 16 08:21:07 -0800
2006 ---
@tono: please prove if external/mingwheaders/makefile.mk is ok. The patch has
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 16 09:21:11 -0800
2006 ---
@vg: I will review external/mingwheaders/makefile.mk. I think the directory
will
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 11 06:23:57 -0800
2006 ---
@vg: I am checking losts and requied patches for new things. The followning
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 10 05:48:00 -0800
2006 ---
@tono: Good news: the mingwport CWS is now based on m192. Please, verify if
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
User tono changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 7 13:25:56 -0800
2006 ---
@vq: As MSVC build will not use configure script, I specified added part only
for
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 6 04:38:44 -0800
2006 ---
@tono: please, send me the patches for cws_src680_mingwport03 revision. I have
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
User tono changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
User tono changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 6 08:08:00 -0800
2006 ---
@tono: cannot use moz (mozilla-source-1.7.5.patch) patch. Please, create a full
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 6 08:42:34 -0800
2006 ---
@tono: in misc/build/Python-2.3.4/configure why have you rewritten
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 2 02:51:53 -0800
2006 ---
@tono: i would use --exclude-libs,ALL for mingw only, because you never know
what
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 2 05:28:12 -0800
2006 ---
@vg: I have not yet made further modification to the patch for
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
User tono changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
User tono changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 2 08:04:28 -0800
2006 ---
@vq: could you please review changes in config_office? They are commited in
CWS
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 1 06:03:18 -0800
2006 ---
@vg: I have modified patches for python and moz based on your comments and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 31 01:59:11 -0800
2006 ---
@tono:in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 30 08:55:42 -0800
2006 ---
@tono: in python, misc/build/Python-2.3.4/pyconfig.h.in I do not understand why
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 26 07:37:07 -0700
2006 ---
@tono: I do not agree with changes in libxmlsec/xmlsec1-1.2.6.patch. Not all the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 26 08:05:22 -0700
2006 ---
@tono: i do not understand why in moz,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 26 08:06:29 -0700
2006 ---
@tono: i do not understand why in moz,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 25 07:11:35 -0700
2006 ---
@vq: As no implicit rule is defined for GCC before, even if an object is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 25 07:15:55 -0700
2006 ---
@tono: I do not agree with some changes i python
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 25 14:31:06 -0700
2006 ---
@vg: The part of the patch in python is not at all intended. Most probably it
was
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 24 08:24:13 -0700
2006 ---
@tono: I do not understand in solenv/inc/rules.mk:
.IF $(COM)==GCC
.IF
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 23 08:10:56 -0700
2006 ---
@vq: could you please review changes in config_office? They are commited in CWS
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
User tono changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 16 05:43:28 -0700
2006 ---
@tono: please, provide me patches to the cws_src680_mingwport03 revision on
module
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 16 06:38:11 -0700
2006 ---
@vg: Will you please clarify the meaning of module? Is one patch file for
one
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 16 06:49:27 -0700
2006 ---
@tono: that is exactly what I want.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
This issue depends on issue 70431, which changed state:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 14 17:29:35 -0700
2006 ---
@vg: I have checked out cws_src680_mingwport03 and found out some patches not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 13 07:22:05 -0700
2006 ---
@tono: you can make a patch against -rcws_src680_mingwport03. This branch
contains
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 12 06:32:59 -0700
2006 ---
@vq: The needed modifications for guw.cc are:
1) Handle '+' character in path
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 12 07:04:24 -0700
2006 ---
1) Handle '+' character in path names
OK, but this can't be a new problem as I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 12 07:25:52 -0700
2006 ---
@vq: I have just noticed that smoe troubles related to the above 2 and 3
maight
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 11 14:24:40 -0700
2006 ---
@vg: As I did no understand the supposed procedures, I have already started
some
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 11 14:43:32 -0700
2006 ---
... And we have to modify the newly
introduced guw.cc before merging to make it
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 10 06:22:17 -0700
2006 ---
Hi, you new patch set - what revision is if for? I need a patches for the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 10 07:13:56 -0700
2006 ---
@vg: Do you like the whole patch set for m180? I can give you the updated
patch
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 10 07:16:34 -0700
2006 ---
@vq: Actually I have already found out some improvements and errors and tested
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 10 07:32:14 -0700
2006 ---
@tono: Hi, i need only patches for the files, that i have mentioned above
(aginst
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
User tono changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 4 05:24:56 -0700
2006 ---
I have attached updated patch set. It includes changed part only.
It includes
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo