[tools-issues] [Issue 56657] OOo 2.0 should be built u nder jdk 1.5

2006-03-11 Thread alonbl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56657 User alonbl changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 56657] OOo 2.0 should be built u nder jdk 1.5

2005-11-01 Thread st
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56657 User st changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 56657] OOo 2.0 should be built u nder jdk 1.5

2005-11-01 Thread st
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56657 User st changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 56657] OOo 2.0 should be built u nder jdk 1.5

2005-11-01 Thread vq
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56657 User vq changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 56657] OOo 2.0 should be built u nder jdk 1.5

2005-11-01 Thread vq
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56657 User vq changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 56657] OOo 2.0 should be built u nder jdk 1.5

2005-11-01 Thread alonbl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56657 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 1 10:27:29 -0800 2005 --- Hi... Should be...? I am sorry... but I know a binary state of an issue... Can

[tools-issues] [Issue 56657] OOo 2.0 should be built u nder jdk 1.5

2005-11-01 Thread vq
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56657 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 1 11:59:54 -0800 2005 --- I build the CWS morejava with jdk 1.5 on Windows. Yes it worked for me. Should