To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
User hjs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
User hjs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 19 10:19:36 -0800
2005 ---
I ran into the offending lines in the makefiles in scripting/java and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
User hjs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 06:32:53 -0800
2005 ---
Fridrich, I will create a CWS soon and put the fixes in.
(As a sidenote: I know
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 07:47:30 -0800
2005 ---
Volker, thanks for considering of putting it into a CWS. It is true that I also
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 11:17:19 -0800
2005 ---
Hi Volker,
I can confirm that it works with your patch and ant 1.5.3-1.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 20:36:47 -0800
2005 ---
No, the version that is in m139 creates a makefile that contains these lines:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
User simonbr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 13 12:13:20 -0800
2005 ---
Yes, that is strange. My configuration command was this:
$ ./configure
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 13 12:17:01 -0800
2005 ---
Your winenv.set looks good. Can you try a different ant? I use apache-ant-1.6.5,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 13 12:19:20 -0800
2005 ---
Oh, and you don't need that
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 13 12:27:54 -0800
2005 ---
Hmm, the real bug is in bsh-2.0b1-src.patch:
!
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
User simonbr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 13 13:32:31 -0800
2005 ---
Volker, I think I get essentially the same result as you when I use ant 1.6.5.
But
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 13 14:07:58 -0800
2005 ---
No, you shouldn't get the cygpath error anymore because that part is removed. I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
User fridrich_strba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 13 23:57:48 -0800
2005 ---
Volker, there are another 2 lines like this (but not commented this time) in the
26 matches
Mail list logo
