To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60692
User np changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60692
User np changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60692
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 18 01:08:13 -0800
2006 ---
quoteIn this case one processes the file with the definition./quote
Huh? We only
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60692
User np changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60692
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 17 05:28:20 -0800
2006 ---
It is (of course) a feature that forward declarations can not hold
documentation.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60692
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 17 08:41:22 -0800
2006 ---
That does not convince me. Think about a case where there is a declaration of
an
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60692
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 17 09:17:20 -0800
2006 ---
where there is a declaration of
an entity in a file that is processed by
