To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62020
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62020
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 9 04:26:07 -0800
2006 ---
i don't like it either...
and i'm also split how to go on with it.
to populate
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62020
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 3 12:40:36 -0800
2006 ---
ause: is it ok for you to create empty build.lst file there.
I do not like it ;-)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62020
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 15 03:34:00 -0800
2006 ---
Since I doubt that that module-list is generated by hand, there should be an
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62020
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 15 07:50:52 -0800
2006 ---
I think you misunderstood me.
However, that list doesn't match the current tag,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62020
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 15 09:30:53 -0800
2006 ---
Adding external_images to instsetoo_native/prj/build.lst is what I meant
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62020
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 15 08:27:49 -0800
2006 ---
To avoid some confusion,
I built successfully using the taglist from tinderbox.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62020
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 15 13:04:27 -0800
2006 ---
After adding external_images to instsetoo_native/prj/build.lst (appended it
after
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62020
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62020
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62020
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 14 00:30:53 -0800
2006 ---
presumably just a cvs alias issue as I can check out the external_images module
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62020
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 14 00:34:38 -0800
2006 ---
Hi Pavel,
Did you check out the new module 'external_images' introduced by CWS
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62020
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62020
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 14 00:54:00 -0800
2006 ---
Probably those modules which must be present but aren't built are not covered
by
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62020
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 14 00:56:05 -0800
2006 ---
The directory is also not available on the Windows machine, where I checked out
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62020
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 14 04:34:18 -0800
2006 ---
Joost-Pavel: When I checked out the source anonymously, yesterday, the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62020
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 14 04:38:33 -0800
2006 ---
Joost: I always start my builds (Build-1) after the milestone is announced as
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62020
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 14 06:06:11 -0800
2006 ---
- Pavel: now I understand what your problem might be: cvs tagging wasn't
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62020
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 14 06:24:11 -0800
2006 ---
Joost, thst's rubbish. Tagging was completely done when the new milestone was
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62020
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 14 10:28:32 -0800
2006 ---
ja: I can confirm - I never start checkout without checking if
zlib/prj/build.lst
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62020
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 14 12:03:50 -0800
2006 ---
JA: that was my understanding yesterday... The checkout I did anonymously
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62020
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62020
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
23 matches
Mail list logo
