To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
User hjs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 25 13:33:23 +
2007 ---
@ause: This should be all for the issue, but it would be easy to add another
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
User hjs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 30 11:45:03 +
2007 ---
if the later of
ttt:
cp aaa ttt
ttt : aaa
doesn't count as virtual target,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 30 12:05:48 +
2007 ---
No, your example would be a regular target. Dmake would collapse that to:
ttt :
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 25 19:58:30 +
2007 ---
The previous patch solves another corner case for targets without recipes but
with
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 22 14:03:01 +
2007 ---
The previous patch fixes the F_RULES problem. Committed.
(Keeping fingers
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 21 13:59:47 +
2007 ---
The second to last patch (iz64572_4.diff) and the corresponding description
made
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 21 15:10:03 +
2007 ---
Committed iz64572_5.diff
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 19 22:20:56 +
2007 ---
The current dmake now correctly warns if targets (with corresponding existing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 20 00:05:32 +
2007 ---
The previous patch assumes for targets without recipe lines that they have a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 18 22:28:04 +
2007 ---
I committed the previous patch. Dmake now warns if a time stamp is not updated
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 14 17:57:43 +
2007 ---
I reverted the patch. More than 32000 warnings were a slight hint that the check
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 13 15:39:37 +
2007 ---
can we get a warning each time a target time gets overwritten by a filedate
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
26 matches
Mail list logo
