To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 8 11:58:39 +
2007 ---
for c): no, it's a problem of db upstream which causes the distros to reinvent
stuf
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 8 11:57:51 +
2007 ---
for c): no, it's a problem of db upstream which causes the distros to reinvent
stuf
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 8 11:50:47 +
2007 ---
to a)
Thats just unrelated. no need to comment. ;)
I just inlined a link in case so
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 7 22:40:09 +
2007 ---
geki:
yes, this patch is imho not OK still:
a) db 4.2 and 4.3 still work. That yo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 13 06:36:56 -0800
2007 ---
any news here to get this into a cws, or not, or what? :)
