To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51385
User hjs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51385
User hjs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51385
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51385
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 7 10:00:45 -0700
2005 ---
cmc->mh: might be good to integrate this reversion into 2.0.
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51385
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51385
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51385
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 1 04:50:15 -0700
2005 ---
sb->cmc: I am not aware that OOo would need executable stack. It does need
execut
