To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 29 02:04:57 -0800
2005 ---
jbu:
I tried with : 2.0m142 at FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE.
I verified
o Your patch
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 29 02:20:30 -0800
2005 ---
jbu:
I also confirmed that in m141, we cannot find pythonSamples
as described.
so
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
User obo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
User jbu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
User jbu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
User jbu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 20 13:56:11 -0800
2005 ---
I have asked on [EMAIL PROTECTED], if someone can integrate the patch.
For the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 16 20:45:41 -0800
2005 ---
jbu:
I'm very sorry to say, it has already been integrated (m140). Apologize for
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 14:49:24 -0800
2005 ---
Hi,
Have you checked whether your changes changes don't cause any harm in build
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 12 13:13:18 -0800
2005 ---
jbu:
I aplogize for being late; pythonlinkfix has been nominated.
but, could you
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
User maho changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
User maho changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 4 00:44:49 -0800
2005 ---
Hi Maho,
I'm sorry but I can't. I've set MH on cc.
Regards,
Oliver.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 4 09:42:05 -0800
2005 ---
maho: why don't you create cws yourself? ;-)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 4 11:13:33 -0800
2005 ---
Hi,
from my point of view, the part
- renaming python.sh to python:
is not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 4 13:00:32 -0800
2005 ---
pjanik:
I'll make it :)
jbu:
Yes, we need symbolic link python to python.sh. and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
User maho changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 3 00:29:24 -0800
2005 ---
The gates for 2.0.1 are almost closed - at least I will not have time to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 3 15:37:27 -0800
2005 ---
obo:
If the patch gets applied as is for 2.0.1, please leave detailed
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 3 21:36:17 -0800
2005 ---
maho:
I am obr, not obo ;-). Similar, but different.
I only could accept this
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 3 22:12:37 -0800
2005 ---
obr:
sorry I made a mistake about your alias. and understand this is not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 3 22:33:01 -0800
2005 ---
maho:
I just thought you might have taken me for the real obo (Sun RE). And not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 3 22:47:54 -0800
2005 ---
obr: thanks for your advice. I'll add obo in Cc:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 3 22:48:06 -0800
2005 ---
obr: thanks for your advice. I'll add obo in Cc:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 3 22:49:43 -0800
2005 ---
obo:
this issue is urgent esp. for MacOSX. is it possible for you to handle this
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 2 15:28:28 -0800
2005 ---
jbu:
that's exaclty same as what's I experienced when I worked for this patch :)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 1 04:42:10 -0800
2005 ---
Hi,
- renaming python.sh to python:
the python executable is delivered as python
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 31 00:10:26 -0800
2005 ---
obo:
I still would lite to give the python core zip the USE_INTERNAL_RIGHTS flag
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 31 00:20:28 -0800
2005 ---
this could be solved making shellscripts_pyuno.txt look like this:
%system linux
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 30 14:59:30 -0700
2005 ---
Add Cc: jbu.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 31 00:02:11 -0700
2005 ---
I took another approach in i56189 to solve the script problem by utilizing the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
User maho changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
33 matches
Mail list logo