To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64888
User jl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64888
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64888
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 10 03:33:54 -0700
2006 ---
@jl, sorry but it is not clear which patch you are talking about. The patch at
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64888
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 10 03:43:13 -0700
2006 ---
I was referring to the patch of 64888. Ok, let's wait for doko.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64888
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 8 01:10:53 -0700
2006 ---
@ cmc, rene, sparcmoz: I could apply this patch, but I do not know if this is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64888
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 30 18:23:39 -0700
2006 ---
i think so too ;) could you please try patch in #i64442#
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64888
User doko changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64888
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64888
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 28 21:03:52 -0700
2006 ---
doko: issue 64442 it may take care of lib32?
