To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65974
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65974
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 7 05:45:00 -0700
2006 ---
I am going to close this ...
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65974
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 1 10:38:08 -0700
2006 ---
It's a duplicate of 65511.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65974
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65974
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 1 11:53:32 -0700
2006 ---
I looked at your patch:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65974
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 1 01:12:26 -0700
2006 ---
geki: Are you sure that this patch is still needed, please? I thought that
Pavel
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65974
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 1 01:46:31 -0700
2006 ---
As long as the way the searchpaths are defined has not changed this is needed
for
