To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76106
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76106
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76106
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 7 08:07:20 +
2007 ---
@fs: Does this mean that decision was against an mere indexOfAscii? Yes.
The
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76106
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 7 11:15:32 +
2007 ---
sure - but an operation every caller has to do again and again, which is what I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76106
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 6 18:51:44 +
2007 ---
I'll see how best to implement that stuff in the first place and then
decide on
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76106
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76106
User obr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76106
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76106
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 5 06:59:00 +
2007 ---
Ha! Otherwise it's always you to throw in the word optimization. ;) Now,
I'm
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76106
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 5 07:23:40 +
2007 ---
LOL :)
I don't complain about you adding the L versions, in fact I think that's a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76106
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 5 06:49:16 +
2007 ---
I know I'm immodest :), but why only the L versions?
Those require
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76106
Issue #|76106
Summary|RFE: ::rtl::OUString::indexOfAscii
Component|udk
Version|current
12 matches
Mail list logo