[udk-issues] [Issue 76106] RFE: ::rtl::OUString::inde xOfAscii

2007-07-04 Thread sb
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76106 User sb changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[udk-issues] [Issue 76106] RFE: ::rtl::OUString::inde xOfAscii

2007-06-11 Thread sb
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76106 User sb changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[udk-issues] [Issue 76106] RFE: ::rtl::OUString::inde xOfAscii

2007-06-07 Thread sb
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76106 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 7 08:07:20 + 2007 --- @fs: Does this mean that decision was against an mere indexOfAscii? Yes. The

[udk-issues] [Issue 76106] RFE: ::rtl::OUString::inde xOfAscii

2007-06-07 Thread fs
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76106 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 7 11:15:32 + 2007 --- sure - but an operation every caller has to do again and again, which is what I

[udk-issues] [Issue 76106] RFE: ::rtl::OUString::inde xOfAscii

2007-06-06 Thread fs
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76106 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 6 18:51:44 + 2007 --- I'll see how best to implement that stuff in the first place and then decide on

[udk-issues] [Issue 76106] RFE: ::rtl::OUString::inde xOfAscii

2007-06-05 Thread sb
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76106 User sb changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[udk-issues] [Issue 76106] RFE: ::rtl::OUString::inde xOfAscii

2007-05-30 Thread obr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76106 User obr changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[udk-issues] [Issue 76106] RFE: ::rtl::OUString::inde xOfAscii

2007-04-05 Thread sb
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76106 User sb changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[udk-issues] [Issue 76106] RFE: ::rtl::OUString::inde xOfAscii

2007-04-05 Thread sb
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76106 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 5 06:59:00 + 2007 --- Ha! Otherwise it's always you to throw in the word optimization. ;) Now, I'm

[udk-issues] [Issue 76106] RFE: ::rtl::OUString::inde xOfAscii

2007-04-05 Thread fs
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76106 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 5 07:23:40 + 2007 --- LOL :) I don't complain about you adding the L versions, in fact I think that's a

[udk-issues] [Issue 76106] RFE: ::rtl::OUString::inde xOfAscii

2007-04-05 Thread fs
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76106 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 5 06:49:16 + 2007 --- I know I'm immodest :), but why only the L versions? Those require

[udk-issues] [Issue 76106] RFE: ::rtl::OUString::inde xOfAscii

2007-04-04 Thread fs
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76106 Issue #|76106 Summary|RFE: ::rtl::OUString::indexOfAscii Component|udk Version|current