To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
--- Additional comments from poorad...@openoffice.org Fri Aug 6 15:47:53
+ 2010 ---
Well, the collate print option seems to work correctly on Lenny 64 :) Just
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
--- Additional comments from o...@openoffice.org Fri Aug 6 07:06:30 +
2010 ---
@ pooradmin: Just stop complaining: Try OOO330_m2 which will be OOo 3.3 and see
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
--- Additional comments from poorad...@openoffice.org Fri Aug 6 06:42:13
+ 2010 ---
A whole Year! o0 I give my best wishes to 3.3 too...
"if the issue is just
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
--- Additional comments from crx...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 5 03:40:05
+ 2010 ---
Only 60? I have over 150 users and we have been waiting over a year. I had t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
--- Additional comments from poorad...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 4 15:16:48
+ 2010 ---
When will there be a patch? We have 60 people here and each of them is prin
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
User hi changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
User pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Fri Sep 4 05:57:59 +
2009 ---
Sometimes things don't happen as you want it. When we (mainly pl) started to
wor
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
--- Additional comments from crx...@openoffice.org Fri Sep 4 03:01:05
+ 2009 ---
Well, I don't want untested or unstable code in a mainline release either. Bu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
--- Additional comments from p...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 3 13:37:22 +
2009 ---
I consider the change in target "bad news", yes. OTOH I wouldn't want "almost"
r
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
--- Additional comments from crx...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 3 11:57:52
+ 2009 ---
I am guessing the change in target is bad news and we won't be able to upgrade
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
User pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
--- Additional comments from p...@openoffice.org Fri Jul 17 08:39:30 +
2009 ---
N-Up is not persistent as per your suggestion. The CWS will hopefully get
integr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
--- Additional comments from crx...@openoffice.org Fri Jul 17 02:16:27
+ 2009 ---
@pl: that is great news, indeed. From what I am reading of what you programmed
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
User pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
--- Additional comments from crx...@openoffice.org Mon Jun 8 21:48:07
+ 2009 ---
@pl: great! Hey- N-up sounds like another really neat option! (If it is what
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
--- Additional comments from p...@openoffice.org Mon Jun 8 11:22:04 +
2009 ---
N-Up is new in the revised print dialog. And I'll take into consideration making
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
--- Additional comments from crx...@openoffice.org Mon Jun 8 11:17:26
+ 2009 ---
Yikes! You don't want persistence on number of copies! I can see tha
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
--- Additional comments from p...@openoffice.org Mon Jun 8 09:29:53 +
2009 ---
FYI: The persistence is not just for the collate checkbox, but for all controls
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
--- Additional comments from crx...@openoffice.org Sun Jun 7 16:26:18
+ 2009 ---
@christophnoack: No, it breaks nothing by having the print dialog remember the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Sun Jun 7 14:33:57 +
2009 ---
Why can't "Tools-Options" just take over the remembered value?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
User christophnoack changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
User pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
User pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
--- Additional comments from crx...@openoffice.org Wed Jun 3 14:50:55
+ 2009 ---
@pl: yes (assuming persistence will last across dialog pop-ups AND across
ses
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
--- Additional comments from p...@openoffice.org Wed Jun 3 11:51:58 +
2009 ---
So persistence plus an configuration entry without UI should do the trick. I
add
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
--- Additional comments from crx...@openoffice.org Wed Jun 3 11:42:56
+ 2009 ---
@mba: Oh, I understand WHY OO emulates collation- non-page-printers (cheap
in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Wed Jun 3 09:58:32 +
2009 ---
Yes. :-) If the setting in the print dialog would be remembered the question
wha
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
--- Additional comments from p...@openoffice.org Wed Jun 3 09:36:43 +
2009 ---
@mba: I think you lost me :-) Does that mean you think persistence of the
collat
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Wed Jun 3 06:41:44 +
2009 ---
wrt. to whether "Collate" should be the default: if we hadn't changed it
recentl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
--- Additional comments from crx...@openoffice.org Wed Jun 3 02:28:36
+ 2009 ---
Sorry, didn't know I wasn't supposed to set targets... perhaps "wishful
thinki
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
User es changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
User es changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
User crxssi changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
User crxssi changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
User pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
User crxssi changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
User es changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
User es changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
Issue #|101973
Summary|Collate print option defaulting to "on" causes problem
|s
Component|ui
41 matches
Mail list logo