To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54757
User sba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54757
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 7 07:17:25 -0800
2005 ---
It seems to work okay in 2.0.1RC2. Thanks.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54757
User dridgway changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54757
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 6 15:11:47 -0800
2005 ---
Hi jvromans,
Issue 39420 has target 2.0.1, which hasn't been released, so it's
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54757
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 27 01:35:33 -0700
2005 ---
I believe this is the same as issue 39420
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54757
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 27 01:45:42 -0700
2005 ---
That would be surprising, since issue 39420 is FIXED/VERIFIED, but this problem
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54757
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 10:08:06 -0700
2005 ---
I can confirm this bug/behaviour/interaction problem on FreeBSD 7,
with ctwm
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54757
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 03:58:46 -0700
2005 ---
The problem still exists in the 2.0 Release Candidate.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54757
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 06:22:35 -0700
2005 ---
I believe that while the original reporter has an important point (something in