To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=972
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 27 13:51:14 -0800
2006 ---
" My suggestion is to have the "base line to base line" orientation only at
runtime (
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=972
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 22 06:05:48 -0800
2006 ---
I want to describe our findings so that you can see where the problems are that
we ha
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=972
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 22 14:42:50 -0800
2006 ---
There is nothing like an "old" file format - we only have "the" Open Document
File Fo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=972
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 22 07:52:04 -0800
2006 ---
Why is it so important to preserve backward compatibility? Why not simply
rev the fi
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=972
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 16 02:50:21 -0800
2006 ---
Hello,
I'm happy to see the status 'started'.
It would be great to see 'Target miles
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=972
User cdeval changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=972
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 3 11:25:38 -0800
2005 ---
add fl to cc
>From issue 56261:
MRU->FL: the vetical-alignment problem of formula ob
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=972
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 3 11:23:43 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 56261 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=972
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 14 15:02:37 -0700
2005 ---
. After Dmaths (http://www.dmaths.org), a new tool for helping formulas edition
is bo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=972
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 30 10:55:54 -0700
2005 ---
*** Issue 39264 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=972
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 30 10:53:38 -0700
2005 ---
*** Issue 53674 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=972
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 7 19:04:06 -0700
2005 ---
Issue Target Milestone should be marked as 00 2.0
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=972
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 5 06:15:25 -0700
2005 ---
I'm very sorry with the problem of alignement(The MS WORD equation fields I use
don't
13 matches
Mail list logo