To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92247
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
O
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92247
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92247
User fst changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92247
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92247
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
O
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92247
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92247
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 1 13:14:47 +
2008 ---
... and while you are at it, how about fixing the whole signing feature? :)
Just k
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92247
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92247
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92247
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 1 09:58:19 +
2008 ---
I'd prefer to pass the XComponentContext along. That is, the initial service
shoul
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92247
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 1 08:57:18 +
2008 ---
Do you mean the comphelper::createProcessComponent usage in
certificatechooser.cxx,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92247
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 1 06:32:39 +
2008 ---
Looks good. You missed the one creation of SerialNumberAdapter in
certificatechoose
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92247
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 31 14:12:54 +
2008 ---
How about this then, uses new service.
Though the existing xmlsecurity doesn't ke
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92247
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92247
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 31 10:45:47 +
2008 ---
Good idea.
Please use a 'new style'. That is define the service in idl (should be a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92247
User mt changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92247
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92247
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92247
Issue #|92247
Summary|xmlsecurity: avoid duplication of object code
Component|xml
Version|DEV300m28
19 matches
Mail list logo