On Thu, 2001-10-04 at 22:05, Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > >Is there any documentation on ALSA 0.9.x? Also, will the "preliminary"
> > >documentation on ALSA 0.5.x ever be updated?
> >
> > The equivalent documentation (i.e. the list of functions with
> > descriptions) exists in the sourc
>Off the top of my head, I can't see why developers
>would choose mutexes over rw-semaphores. If you take
>the write-lock then you have exclusive access to the
>resource, exactly as with a mutex. There's nothing
>that says you can't read the resource as well, and so
>I don't really understand your
For example, any potential contention issue where two
execution threads want to read the same data
structures and don't want to write. A mutex serialises
these threads whereas a rw-semaphore would allow them
to execute concurrently.
The only example I can think of off the top of my head
is multip
> >Is there any documentation on ALSA 0.9.x? Also, will the "preliminary"
> >documentation on ALSA 0.5.x ever be updated?
>
> The equivalent documentation (i.e. the list of functions with
> descriptions) exists in the source and can be generated with
> doxygen. It is not currently available online
>I have noticed that ALSA tends to use mutexes a lot
>for its internal locking. Has anyone ever considered
>using rw-semaphores instead? The biggest impact would
>probably be to the /proc filesystem since it would
>allow multiple concurrent readers, but I suppose that
>it might also reduce other c
>Is there any documentation on ALSA 0.9.x? Also, will the "preliminary"
>documentation on ALSA 0.5.x ever be updated?
The equivalent documentation (i.e. the list of functions with
descriptions) exists in the source and can be generated with
doxygen. It is not currently available online. There has
On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, CC Computer Consulting Co. wrote:
> According to experts, today's deluged direct mail recipient throws away
> 26% to 88% of all their "junk mail" UNOPENED!
>
> Would you like to increase your responses by an average of 3 to 6 times??
that's funny. why would i want to pay som
Is there any documentation on ALSA 0.9.x? Also, will the "preliminary"
documentation on ALSA 0.5.x ever be updated?
Lastly, is the ALSA 0.9.x MIDI API backwards compatible with 0.5.x?
Thanks.
-- Ricardo
___
On Thu, 2001-10-04 at 08:58, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At 02 Oct 2001 14:25:03 -0700,
> Josh Green wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2001-10-02 at 10:33, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > i'm trying to run latency test for ALSA9 (based on Benno's latency
> > > suite) on my kernel to measure the latency
Hi,
I have noticed that ALSA tends to use mutexes a lot
for its internal locking. Has anyone ever considered
using rw-semaphores instead? The biggest impact would
probably be to the /proc filesystem since it would
allow multiple concurrent readers, but I suppose that
it might also reduce other co
At Tue, 02 Oct 2001 19:33:45 +0200, I wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> i'm trying to run latency test for ALSA9 (based on Benno's latency
> suite) on my kernel to measure the latency with preemption and LL
> kernel patches.
> however, the test program hangs up almost always in the middle during
> disk write
At 02 Oct 2001 14:25:03 -0700,
Josh Green wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2001-10-02 at 10:33, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > i'm trying to run latency test for ALSA9 (based on Benno's latency
> > suite) on my kernel to measure the latency with preemption and LL
> > kernel patches.
> > however, the tes
IF YOU USE DIRECT MAIL IN YOUR BUSINESS
-- THEN READ ON.
OTHERWISE, JUST DELETE THIS MESSAGE.
Make Every Letter Count - Get Every Letter Opened!
Did you know??
According to experts, today's deluged direct mail recipient throws away
26% to 88% of all their "junk mail" UNOPENED!
Would you li
Hello everyone,
This will probably be my last release for a little while.
It is a set of header files which operate time code. There is also a GTK
based X interface developed within for interaction with the time code.
Available from :
http://mffmtimecode.sourceforge.net/
Description :
It is a C
14 matches
Mail list logo
