> > Sumary of changes:
> > - Some volume bug fixes
> > - SPDIF input fix.
> > - Clear sample buffer after closing IEC958 stream.
> > - Ring buffer fix (see my previous mail)
> > - Some other misses, corrections
>
> applied. thanks for your patch!
nice, now alsa cvs and the cs46xx are best fr
On Tuesday 03 December 2002 16:24, Friedrich Ewaldt wrote:
> Hi Benny,
w00t!
it seems that volumes 0-0x7fff ramp up volumes, then 8000- go back down...
but with opposite phases. So...
--- alsa-cvs/alsa-driver-0.9.0rc6cvs20021202/alsa-kernel/pci/cs46xx/dsp_spos.h
2002-11-24 19:52:17.
On Thursday 21 November 2002 18:09, Benny Sjostrand wrote:
> Thanks, that explication makes sense.
>
> If it was that simple that Santa Cruz where the only card in the world with
> this problem, but there's the same problem is reported for other cs46xx
> based card's
> too.
>
> >well, how did it wo
On Tuesday 19 November 2002 01:28, you wrote:
> I get the following error during the 'make' step. I am running kde3.1 rc3
> with gcc3.2
err, oops. It only built here because my standard artsmodules.h had stuff in
it from when I'd originally just added it to kdemm. My bad.
grab http://ophelia.st
On Monday 18 November 2002 22:00, Weijia Yang wrote:
> > okay, well for any aRts/noatun users who'd like to a) test their card or
> > b) get a temporary workaround, I'll upload my cheesy effect fikter, which
> > will either make your sound much better or much worse :-).
> >
> > http://ophelia.stude
On Monday 18 November 2002 08:30, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> Kevin Puetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Now, why in the world the santa cruz would be wired in such a way that
> > software which is fine on other cards would get one channel backwards on
> >
On Sunday 17 November 2002 23:01, Benny Sjostrand wrote:
> >>So... anything that can be done to fix this (I assume so, since it's a
> >> new problem since older alsa), or do I have to cut my speaker wires
> >> apart? :-P
>
> I'm still a newbie to the audio world, but just wondering, why design a
>
On Sunday 17 November 2002 00:56, you wrote:
> I am not currently a subscriber to this list, so pease CC me on any
> responses.
OK, I decided to subscribe, so I ignore this.
> Frank, Benny, the guess of a phase reversal as responsible for the 'lack of
> bass' on this card is dead-on - a little t
