Hi.
I was reading through some code, and a came across what looks like an unnecessary if
statement.
In alsa-lib/src/pcm/pcm_params.c. The 7th line in the _snd_pcm_hw_param_set_min
function reads:
if(val > 0)
A quick look at val's definition, in the function header, reveals that it's an
un
state that NONBLOCK and ASYNC are flags,
and not mode numbers.
Sorry bout that :-)
Kyle C.
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Kyle Centers wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > I've been playing around with the asound library for a while now, and
> > there's someting tha
Hi.
I've been playing around with the asound library for a while now, and there's someting
that really gets under my skin.
The snd_pcm_open function, requires an open mode parameter, which, according to the
documentation, defaults to blocking mode, but can be set to SND_PCM_NONBLOCK, or
SND_P
Hi
Still nit-picking, but the following code is just ugly, and I cannot see any reason
for writing it this way. From card_emu10k1.c (and a few other files in card/, as a
quick look shows), the snd_emu10k1_probe(...), starting at line 97:
for ( ; dev < SNDRV_CARDS; dev++) {
if (!snd_ena
I hate to be nit picky, but I have been trying to figure something out, and am at a
complete loss.
In alsa-drivers, the file card-emu10k1.c, line 79 or there about reads:
static struct pci_device_id snd_emu10k1_ids[] __devinitdata = {
After an hour of searching, I finally discovered that __dev
-Original Message-
From: Jaroslav Kysela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 19:33:55 +0100 (CET)
To: Kyle Centers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Alsa-devel] bug in alsa-lib
> On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Kyle Centers wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I
ad the asound library. Now, the error is gone (the first one. I havent' gotten to
the second, although I suspect it is similar). Anyone know how to fix ths properly?
Kyle Centers.
--
___
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.
