-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 17. Mrz 2004 20:22 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi everyone,
my diploma project is to develop an echo canceler for controlling
application with speech. For this purpose, I need to know what a
sound card is currently playing. I was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 9. Februar 2004 15:07 schrieb Jaroslav Kysela:
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Peter Kirk wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 5. Februar 2004 17:49 schrieb Jaroslav Kysela:
Could you point me to a good idea of implementing this ? On irc I was
discussing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Donnerstag, 5. Februar 2004 17:49 schrieb Jaroslav Kysela:
Could you point me to a good idea of implementing this ? On irc I was
discussing doing a libc wrapper that replaces the fopen calls with some
substitute (that aoss can handle), but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey,
During a thread on alsa-user I was told that aoss does not wrap fopen() calls.
Since I am trying to dmix/dnsoop/asym some oss applications, I am trying to
find a way around this restriction.
Could you point me to a good idea of implementing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Sonntag, 01. Februar 2004 18:50 schrieb Florian Schmidt:
On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 13:48:38 +0100
Florian Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
problem persists with alsa-1.0.2
Flo
Well,
I wish to report that on my soundblaster live card I can play the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 17. Dezember 2003 21:11 schrieb David Lloyd:
After much frustration being stuck on intel8x0 and trying to run teamspeak
at the same time as a game, I was looking at the dmix implementation and I
had several questions.
So I will make
WARNING: Unsanitized content follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 17. November 2003 18:16 schrieb Mark Hubbard:
Peter Kirk has an important point. Default dmix (smart could be a
misnomer) will only work as the default pcm, therefore if one application
is set-up
WARNING: Unsanitized content follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 17. November 2003 19:49 schrieb Takashi Iwai:
At Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:18:49 +0100,
Peter Kirk wrote:
Am Montag, 17. November 2003 15:33 schrieb Takashi Iwai:
if I understand it right, then high-end
WARNING: Unsanitized content follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 17. November 2003 20:40 schrieb Paul Davis:
well, my concern is that with the high-end cards, people tend to stick
with the quality of sounds. that means, any reason to reduce the
quality
WARNING: Unsanitized content follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 17. November 2003 21:05 schrieb Jaroslav Kysela:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Paul Davis wrote:
what you say seems to be valid to me, but not if you implement smart
dmix the way I said =). The way I
WARNING: Unsanitized content follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 17. November 2003 22:58 schrieb James Courtier-Dutton:
Hi,
Just a general comment on dmix/dsnoop.
1) It is not bug free yet.
right. It would be great if you guys that have some overview would map
WARNING: Unsanitized content follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 14. November 2003 13:21 schrieb Paul Davis:
So, these are two numbers - and basicly all is fine as long as you dont
wan= t=20
to excede them, but if you do, you need to use dmix or dsnoop. Why not
WARNING: Unsanitized content follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 14. November 2003 16:31 schrieb Takashi Iwai:
At Fri, 14 Nov 2003 15:11:22 +,
Mark Hubbard wrote:
On Friday 14 Nov 2003 13:20, Takashi Iwai wrote:
as a future plan, we'll define dmix as
WARNING: Unsanitized content follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi guys,
In the last few days I have been reading a lot about how to mix streams into
one in order to allow *weak* soundcards to play multiple streams, even though
they cant do that in hardware. This seems to
14 matches
Mail list logo
