Thanks Paul. I am not sure how I was able to get the
data on channel 0 and 1 with the beta6, but to save
all of us from any more time on this matter, I am
going to have my application just look at channels 16
and 17. Thanks again for all you help.
--- Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >O
> are you trying to record a s/pdif signal, or an ADAT
> signal?
The input on ADAT1 (in) is an optical line connected
directly to a DAT Recorder/Player. So maybe I am
confused, isn't this specific optical input connection
an ADAT signal? Or should I be setting the optical
input as s/pdif? If t
When tyring to use beta6, ..., beta9, I get an error
in the device open() call that states an unknown/bad
ioctl command. The beta6 worked well with the 2.2.19
kernel. I am wondering if this is a problem when used
with a 2.4.19 kernel. Can anyone validate? It seems
that the only way the PVERSIO
In the past I developed an application with release
0.9.0beta6 on a dual 1Ghz Pentium 3 with the
Hammerfall Light. Tha application would read 2
channels from a DAT player @48Khz. I now must upgrade
the hardware to a dual Pentium 4 and a newer kernel.
The beta6 doesn't seem to work with the newe
Paul,
Here is the details, the rest is what I could gather
from an execution in ddd:
ALSA lib pcm_hw.c:579: (snd_pcm_hw_open)
SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_PVERSION failed: Inappropriate ioctl
for device
failed to open audio device default
(Inappropriate ioctl for device)
snd_pcm_hw_open
Is there any know problems with 0.9.0rc2/Linux
2.4.19/RME HammerFall. I had a working application
using 0.9.0beta6/Linux/2.2.19/RME HammerFall, since I
am changing to a Intel P4 arch, I can't get the beta6
to work. It fails on an ioctl with something about a
PVERSION... I would like to use a ne
Does the 0.9.0beta6 release work with 2.4.x kernels,
specifically 2.4.19? Thanks for the help.
=
Shane M. Walton, Software Engineer
Digital System Resources, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
703.234.1674
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Fina