I like the new page.
Some ideas for further improvement:
1.) How about merging API and documentation into one page?
I think this separation is confusing, especially if developers
follow "their" link on the frontpage and end up at the API page
that doesn't even mention alsa 0.9.
2.) M
>From a recent thread I learned that my RME DIGI96 only
allows period sizes of 2048 or 8192 bytes. No other choices,
due to hardware design. So what if the applications asks for
256 bytes? If the applications insists on that, it won't run. If
it asks for "near", it'll get not what it expects, but
Paul,
I saw you pointing to the problematic usage of mutex with
ringbuffers a couple of times now. In the most recent case
you mentioned a solution of yours without mutices (sorry,
I can't find the reference anymore ... probably was on LAD).
To me it's not clear why protecting a ringbuffer with
Am Dienstag, 13. November 2001 23:04 schrieb Wolfgang Hoffmann:
> Am Mittwoch, 7. November 2001 22:33 schrieb Anders Torger:
> > Hmmm... strange... I use the driver almost every day, and I have not seen
> > any problems. I also wrote the driver, but it has been some time since I
&
Am Mittwoch, 7. November 2001 22:33 schrieb Anders Torger:
> On Wednesday 07 November 2001 23.18, you wrote:
> >
> > 1.) alsa-oss-0.9.0beta9 fails to compile with:
> > make: *** No rule to make target `aoss.in', needed by `aoss'. Stop.
> > Is aoss.in missing in the tar-ball, or am I doing somethi
