This is the first shot at this - I've tested it on ARM, covering both
ISA ALSA devices on a PCI machine, and driver model devices on a non-
PCI, non-ISA machine. However, it needs more testing. Can people
on alsa-devel please test these patches.
This patch adds support for the generic device/dri
Hi,
At Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:38:20 +,
Russell King wrote:
>
> This is the first shot at this - I've tested it on ARM, covering both
> ISA ALSA devices on a PCI machine, and driver model devices on a non-
> PCI, non-ISA machine. However, it needs more testing. Can people
> on alsa-devel please
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> i also think that we can split pre-allocate stuffs and initialization
> stuffs to simplify. that is, we provide the initializer
> snd_pcm_lib_set_dma_type(pcm, SND_DMA_PCI, ...);
> or somethine like that. and call a single function,
> snd_pcm_lib_p
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 04:41:00PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:38:20 +,
> Russell King wrote:
> >
> > This is the first shot at this - I've tested it on ARM, covering both
> > ISA ALSA devices on a PCI machine, and driver model devices on a non-
> > PCI, non-ISA machine
At Mon, 1 Mar 2004 17:45:17 +,
Russell King wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 04:41:00PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:38:20 +,
> > Russell King wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the first shot at this - I've tested it on ARM, covering both
> > > ISA ALSA devices on a PC
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 06:51:56PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> a small concern about GFP_KERNEL is that i experienced the stall when
> the kernel tried to allocate large continuous pages with GFP_KERNEL,
> e.g. modprobe stops infinitely in the module init phase (and you
> cannot even interrupt tha
At Mon, 1 Mar 2004 18:22:24 +,
Russell King wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 06:51:56PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > a small concern about GFP_KERNEL is that i experienced the stall when
> > the kernel tried to allocate large continuous pages with GFP_KERNEL,
> > e.g. modprobe stops infini
At Mon, 01 Mar 2004 19:34:57 +0100,
I wrote:
>
> at the initialization. when __get_free_pages() for 256MB with
> GFP_KERNEL is called, it goes to sleep and never gets back.
additional note: 256MB might be wrong but anyway it was a large
number. the driver tries to allocate as large buffers as p
At Mon, 01 Mar 2004 18:51:56 +0100,
I wrote:
>
> At Mon, 1 Mar 2004 17:45:17 +,
> Russell King wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 04:41:00PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > At Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:38:20 +,
> > > Russell King wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This is the first shot at this - I'v
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 03:09:15PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Mon, 01 Mar 2004 18:51:56 +0100,
> I wrote:
> > ah, yes, then it's fine. thanks.
>
> i was too fast to confirm that -- it turned out that this doesn't
> help.
>
> since dma_alloc_coherent() is just a wrapper to pci_alloc_consiste
At Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:26:32 +,
Russell King wrote:
>
> I, therefore, suggest that you're not looking at a 2.6.3 kernel. This
> was changed from pci_alloc_consistent to dma_alloc_coherent on 22 Dec,
> and was modified to take the GFP flags on 13 Jan.
>
> dma_alloc_coherent() is therefore not
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 03:38:28PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> BTW, there are some typos in your patches, and missing replacement of
> PCI -> DEV dma type. the attached patch should fix.
Thanks for finding these - as you can guess, the code didn't get built
for x86 when I tested it, neither was
At Mon, 01 Mar 2004 19:34:57 +0100,
I wrote:
>
> At Mon, 1 Mar 2004 18:22:24 +,
> Russell King wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 06:51:56PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > a small concern about GFP_KERNEL is that i experienced the stall when
> > > the kernel tried to allocate large cont
13 matches
Mail list logo
