Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: ALSA patch for 2.5.4

2002-02-11 Thread Alan Cox
> I don't think that at this stage we should be talking to Linus Torvalds at > all. He is probably too busy. You think too much > I think that a much better approach would be to talk to the current kernel > oss sound developers, and get alsa checked into the kernel via them. Already done - and

RE: [Alsa-devel] Re: ALSA patch for 2.5.4

2002-02-11 Thread James Courtier-Dutton
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Garzik > Sent: 12 February 2002 00:23 > To: Dan Mann > Cc: Jaroslav Kysela; ALSA development; LKML; Linus Torvalds > Subject: [Alsa-devel] Re: ALSA patch for 2.5.4 > > > Dan Mann wrote: > > On Mon, 2002-02-11 at 09:16, Jaroslav Kysel

[Alsa-devel] Re: ALSA patch for 2.5.4

2002-02-11 Thread Linus Torvalds
On 11 Feb 2002, Dan Mann wrote: > > There are at least 2 reasons that I can see why Linus probably won't > accept your patch: > > 1. It is not an inline text attachment (it is a URL). > 2. It is 79,000 lines long No, both of those are actually ok, I'm not religious about big things l

[Alsa-devel] Re: ALSA patch for 2.5.4

2002-02-11 Thread Jeff Garzik
Dan Mann wrote: > On Mon, 2002-02-11 at 09:16, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > I repeat myself but anyway. We are open to any suggestions and > > ideas for this kernel integration patch. Unfortunately, Linus has not > > approved this directory tree and he is not talking with us at the time. > > I