> > on the other hand, having more documentation is almost always a
> > good thing. now, where are the volunteers?
>
> Lot's of possible flames here but the main thing is that the
> people who do understand the alsa-driver well enough are either
> too busy to find the time or have justifiable re
Paul Davis wrote:
i disagree. there seem to be very few people interested in working on
alsa-kernel or alsa-lib. most people want a nice, easy to use API so
that they can dump sounds to an audio interface or possibly record
them. the number of people with the skills, knowledge and interest in
wor
> >actually, i have to note that this is not so obvious. there are *many*
> >people using ALSA. we've all sworn our way through the process.
> >there is *no* point in reminding this list about the need for
> >documentation. the current state is pitiful, ...
> > many folks seem to think there is a
At Mon, 09 Dec 2002 09:54:10 -0500,
John S. Denker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> To look at the same glass from the half-full perspective,
> Takashi wrote:
>
> > recently i wrote a small howto for writing an alsa-driver.
>
> That's good!
>
> > please check the archive of alsa-devel ml.
>
>
