2008/1/1, Erik Slagter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
John Haxby wrote:
I've lost the bit where you said about you're against putting an
unmatured[sic] system in a distro. Fedora is a proving ground for
relatively immature systems -- compiz and beryl are a good example: if
you want a guaranteed
2007/12/31, John Haxby [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Erik Slagter wrote:
As imho pulseaudio doesn't add significant functionality if you're not
using remote (over the network) audio, you'd be better off without it,
i.e. remove all pulseaudio packages alltogether.
That must be a different
2007/12/31, John Haxby [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
2007/12/31, John Haxby [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That must be a different pulseaudio to the one I'm using then. The
per-application mixer (pavucontrol) is very useful
How this is useful? Each app already has it's own
Introducing a /proc/asound/card0/pcm0{p,c}/hw_limits or similar might not be
a bad idea though?
That would be good idea, with completion with 'alsainfo' about device.
How to do that properly, any clues before I try to sink my teeths in ALSA code?
P.
Current sample rate only has meaning with the device open , and if I
understand you right, a cat /proc/asound/card0/pcm0{p,c}/sub0/hw_params
will then get you what you want as to the get part (substitute for 0 in
the above as required).
I actually meant what kind of sample rate is set in
I have onboard sound card of ATI fame:
:00:14.2 Audio device: ATI Technologies Inc SB450 HDA Audio (rev 01)
Uses snd-intel-hda module.
So, this sound card seems to be fixed to 48000Hz for recording. I
know, that using plughw will help to avoid any problems with
resampling and I also have no
