Re: [Alsa-user] cs4299 vs intel8x0

2003-02-12 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Tue, 11 Feb 2003 19:05:38 +0100, tom roth wrote: > > Thank you for your prompt reply, > so do i understand correctly, the core functions are supported by AC97 compatibility, > but the full capabilities of the chip are not (yet) supported ? please read my post again. the core part is intel8x0.

Re: [Alsa-user] cs4299 vs intel8x0

2003-02-11 Thread tom roth
Thank you for your prompt reply, so do i understand correctly, the core functions are supported by AC97 compatibility, but the full capabilities of the chip are not (yet) supported ? tom On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 18:18:18 +0100 Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:27:22 +01

Re: [Alsa-user] cs4299 vs intel8x0

2003-02-11 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:27:22 +0100, tom roth wrote: > > i have a laptop with a cs4299 soundchip, while i could find nothing about this >chipset on the alsa website, the basic functions are being provided by the intel8x0 >driver. > Since i am maintaining a website on this laptop (asus l2400b) i w

[Alsa-user] cs4299 vs intel8x0

2003-02-11 Thread tom roth
i have a laptop with a cs4299 soundchip, while i could find nothing about this chipset on the alsa website, the basic functions are being provided by the intel8x0 driver. Since i am maintaining a website on this laptop (asus l2400b) i would like to know how the cs4299 relates to intel8x0, so that