Trevor Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2.6.21 is a kernel version. I'm aware that there's some interplay
> between the alsa package and the kernel, but also that the alsa package
> compiles modules against the kernel, replacing modules that would
> ordinarily be compiled by the kernel.
>
Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:15:10 +0200,
> Prakash Punnoor wrote:
>
>> Yes, works! surround and c/lfe work and the "volume bug" is gone. Very nice.
>> Could we get this pushed into 2.6.21?
>>
>> Note that your patch doesn't apply cleanly to 2.6.21-rc6, though.
>>
>
> Thank
At Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:15:10 +0200,
Prakash Punnoor wrote:
>
> Am Mittwoch 18 April 2007 schrieb Takashi Iwai:
> > At Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:40:02 +0200,
> >
> > Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > > [1 ]
> > >
> > > Am Dienstag 17 April 2007 schrieb Takashi Iwai:
> > > > At Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:40:04 +0200,
Am Mittwoch 18 April 2007 schrieb Takashi Iwai:
> At Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:40:02 +0200,
>
> Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > [1 ]
> >
> > Am Dienstag 17 April 2007 schrieb Takashi Iwai:
> > > At Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:40:04 +0200,
> > >
> > > > Patch works for me. Just the "volume is 0 on ch setting change"
At Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:40:02 +0200,
Prakash Punnoor wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> Am Dienstag 17 April 2007 schrieb Takashi Iwai:
> > At Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:40:04 +0200,
>
> > > Patch works for me. Just the "volume is 0 on ch setting change" bug left.
> >
> > Did you unmute and adjust surround and CLFE volu
Am Dienstag 17 April 2007 schrieb Takashi Iwai:
> At Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:40:04 +0200,
> > Patch works for me. Just the "volume is 0 on ch setting change" bug left.
>
> Did you unmute and adjust surround and CLFE volumes properly
> beforehand?
Yes, of course...
--
(°= =°)
//\ Pr
Am Montag 16 April 2007 schrieb Takashi Iwai:
> At Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:42:10 +0200,
> > I guess writing 0xb000 is not enough, as the lower 6 bits are gain value.
> > Or does the gain get applied somewhere else?
>
> It corresponds to "Mic Boost" control.
I don't get it. I am referring to:
At Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:40:04 +0200,
Prakash Punnoor wrote:
>
> Am Montag 16 April 2007 schrieb Takashi Iwai:
> > At Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:42:10 +0200,
> > > I guess writing 0xb000 is not enough, as the lower 6 bits are gain value.
> > > Or does the gain get applied somewhere else?
> >
> > It corresp
FYI, I'm eagerly watching this discussion as a user from the sidelines.
I'll be happy to test out release candidates once they come out, but
until then I don't want to mess with my(mostly) working settings.
Keep going guys!
Trevor
Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:42:10 +0200,
> Pr
At Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:42:10 +0200,
Prakash Punnoor wrote:
>
> Am Montag 16 April 2007 schrieb Takashi Iwai:
> > At Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:03:51 +0200,
> >
> > Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > > Am Montag 16 April 2007 schrieb Takashi Iwai:
> > > > At Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:51:21 +0200,
> > > >
> > > > Prakas
Am Montag 16 April 2007 schrieb Takashi Iwai:
> At Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:03:51 +0200,
>
> Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > Am Montag 16 April 2007 schrieb Takashi Iwai:
> > > At Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:51:21 +0200,
> > >
> > > Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > > > Am Montag 16 April 2007 schrieb Takashi Iwai:
> > > >
At Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:03:51 +0200,
Prakash Punnoor wrote:
>
> Am Montag 16 April 2007 schrieb Takashi Iwai:
> > At Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:51:21 +0200,
> >
> > Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > > Am Montag 16 April 2007 schrieb Takashi Iwai:
> > > > At Sat, 14 Apr 2007 11:24:49 +0200,
> > > >
> > > > Prakas
Am Montag 16 April 2007 schrieb Takashi Iwai:
> At Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:51:21 +0200,
>
> Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > Am Montag 16 April 2007 schrieb Takashi Iwai:
> > > At Sat, 14 Apr 2007 11:24:49 +0200,
> > >
> > > Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > > > So my guess is that probably setting ad1986a_3st_init
At Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:51:21 +0200,
Prakash Punnoor wrote:
>
> Am Montag 16 April 2007 schrieb Takashi Iwai:
> > At Sat, 14 Apr 2007 11:24:49 +0200,
> >
> > Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > > So my guess is that probably setting ad1986a_3st_init_verbs is wrong for
> > > my mobo.
> > >
> > > {0x0f, AC_
Am Montag 16 April 2007 schrieb Takashi Iwai:
> At Sat, 14 Apr 2007 11:24:49 +0200,
>
> Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > So my guess is that probably setting ad1986a_3st_init_verbs is wrong for
> > my mobo.
> >
> > {0x0f, AC_VERB_SET_CONNECT_SEL, 0x2},
> > {0x10, AC_VERB_SET_CONNECT_SEL, 0x1},
>
Oliver Lupton wrote:
On my A8N-VM then it's working with *init_verbs* commented, max_channels
set to 6 and num_dacs set to 3.
I haven't tried it, but if you're changing num_init_verbs to 1 then it
looks like spec->init_verbs[2] = ad1986a_ch2_init; should have
spec->init_verbs[1] instead?
-ol
At Sat, 14 Apr 2007 11:24:49 +0200,
Prakash Punnoor wrote:
>
> Am Freitag 13 April 2007 schrieb Trevor Bradley:
> > I *didn't* get it working. I eventually got stereo sound working by
> > eliminating all references to 5.1 sound (try eliminating your .asoundrc
> > file if you've already created on
Prakash Punnoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So my guess is that probably setting ad1986a_3st_init_verbs is wrong
> for my mobo.
>
> {0x0f, AC_VERB_SET_CONNECT_SEL, 0x2},
> {0x10, AC_VERB_SET_CONNECT_SEL, 0x1},
>
> What do those magic number 0x1 and 0x2 mean here? I looked into hda
>
Am Samstag 14 April 2007 schrieb Oliver Lupton:
> Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > OK, I was right. Taking out ad1986a_3st_init_verbs is enough for making
> > it work:
> >
> > case AD1986A_3STACK:
> > spec->num_mixers = 2;
> > spec->mixers[1] = ad1986a_3st_mixers;
> >
Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> OK, I was right. Taking out ad1986a_3st_init_verbs is enough for making it
> work:
>
> case AD1986A_3STACK:
> spec->num_mixers = 2;
> spec->mixers[1] = ad1986a_3st_mixers;
> spec->num_init_verbs = 1;//2;
> //sp
Am Samstag 14 April 2007 schrieb Prakash Punnoor:
> Hah! I managed it!!! Just tested with speaker-test, so far. I hacked the
> driver a bit:
>
> In patch_analog.c in static int patch_ad1986a(struct hda_codec *codec)
>
> case AD1986A_3STACK:
> spec->num_mixers = 2;
>
Am Freitag 13 April 2007 schrieb Trevor Bradley:
> I *didn't* get it working. I eventually got stereo sound working by
> eliminating all references to 5.1 sound (try eliminating your .asoundrc
> file if you've already created one).
[..]
> Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag 22 Februar 2007 s
I *didn't* get it working. I eventually got stereo sound working by
eliminating all references to 5.1 sound (try eliminating your .asoundrc
file if you've already created one).
If your drivers are giving you a hassle after recompiling, try
rebooting. There are a lot of dependent drivers and r
Am Donnerstag 22 Februar 2007 schrieb Trevor Bradley:
> For reference, I've fixed this problem. Be sure not to just do an rmmod
> of snd_hda_codec, but *every* snd module. Do an lsmod and rmmod
> everything that looks like snd*. I was trying to reload snd_hda_codec
> while leaving other alsa 1.0
For reference, I've fixed this problem. Be sure not to just do an rmmod
of snd_hda_codec, but *every* snd module. Do an lsmod and rmmod
everything that looks like snd*. I was trying to reload snd_hda_codec
while leaving other alsa 1.0.11 drivers loaded.
That should have been obvious, but it
Oliver Lupton wrote:
> Trevor Bradley wrote:
>> As posted to linuxquestions.org. They redirected me here...
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Please, for the sweet love of Zombie Jeebus, help me.
>>
>> I have two machines using an ASUS M2NPV-VM motherboard, both running
>> Slackware Linux 11.0. One machine is my h
Trevor Bradley wrote:
> As posted to linuxquestions.org. They redirected me here...
>
> ---
>
> Please, for the sweet love of Zombie Jeebus, help me.
>
> I have two machines using an ASUS M2NPV-VM motherboard, both running
> Slackware Linux 11.0. One machine is my home file+web server and Myth
As posted to linuxquestions.org. They redirected me here...
---
Please, for the sweet love of Zombie Jeebus, help me.
I have two machines using an ASUS M2NPV-VM motherboard, both running
Slackware Linux 11.0. One machine is my home file+web server and MythTV
backend (with 2.0 speakers). The o
28 matches
Mail list logo
