Dear ALTO WG members,
this draft is a candidate for our charter item: One or more
alternatives to the base ALTO server discovery mechanism (RFC-to-be) to
accommodate environments where (1) timely deployment of existing
mechanisms, including the base ALTO server discovery mechanism, is
unlikely,.
From: alto [mailto:alto-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Y. Richard Yang
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2014 8:09 PM
To: Sebastian Kiesel
Cc: IETF ALTO
Subject: Re: [alto] Potential privacy issue in draft-deng-alto-p2p-ext-01?
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Sebastian Kiesel
Hi Richard,
Thanks for your review and comments.
We are currently working on another revision with hope that it would address at
least some of the issues here.
More inline.
Lingli
From: yang.r.y...@gmail.com [mailto:yang.r.y...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Y.
Richard Yang
Sent: Friday,
3.3. Endpoint Property Type: network_access
Sorry to say, but frankly, I don't like this idea.
I have two ideas how we could move forward, and we could to only one of
them or even both:
[yry] I support both, instead of only one, as appeared in -02. Please see below.
1.) define
Dear all,
We have submitted an update of the net-graph draft below. The goal of the
draft is to study the graph representation WG item. Here is a quick summary
of some key components of the draft and related issues:
1. A parallel draft by Michael Scharf (who is a co-author of this draft) as
well
