[alto] I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-19.txt

2020-03-02 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Application-Layer Traffic Optimization WG of the IETF. Title : Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) Cost Calendar Authors : Sabine Randria

Re: [alto] [OPS-DIR] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-18.txt

2020-03-02 Thread Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
Dear Jürgen, Barry and all, A new version has been submitted that hopefully addresses Jürgen and Barry’s IESG review comments. Thanks again for your helpful suggestions. There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-19 https://datatra

Re: [alto] [OPS-DIR] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-18.txt

2020-03-02 Thread Schönwälder , Jürgen
Dear Sabine, this version looks good to me. /js On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 12:06:36PM +, Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) wrote: > Dear Jürgen, Barry and all, > > A new version has been submitted that hopefully addresses Jürgen and Barry’s > IESG review comments. > Thanks again

Re: [alto] [OPS-DIR] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-18.txt

2020-03-02 Thread Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
Hello Jürgen, Thanks a lot, Best regards, Sabine -Original Message- From: Schönwälder, Jürgen Sent: Monday, March 2, 2020 2:18 PM To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) Cc: Y. Richard Yang ; IETF ALTO ; The IESG ; alto-cha...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-alto-cost-calen...@ietf.o

Re: [alto] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-17

2020-03-02 Thread Vijay Gurbani
Dear Richard: I will suggest a couple of minor modifications: New paragraph: > > The operator should be should be cognizant that the preceding mechanisms >do not address all security risks. In particular, they will not help in >the case of “malicious clients” possessing valid credential

Re: [alto] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-17

2020-03-02 Thread Y. Richard Yang
Thanks a lot, Vijay! The edit looks good. We will commit the edit when we upload a new version on Thursday. Richard On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 10:02 AM Vijay Gurbani wrote: > Dear Richard: I will suggest a couple of minor modifications: > > New paragraph: > >> >> The operator should be should be

Re: [alto] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-17

2020-03-02 Thread Mirja Kuehlewind
If these stay the only changes, we can add them as RFC editor notes without the need to upload a new version. Mirja > On 2. Mar 2020, at 19:12, Y. Richard Yang wrote: > > Thanks a lot, Vijay! The edit looks good. > > We will commit the edit when we upload a new version on Thursday. > Richar

[alto] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-19: (with COMMENT)

2020-03-02 Thread Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-19: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

Re: [alto] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-19: (with COMMENT)

2020-03-02 Thread Y. Richard Yang
Dear Roman, Thank you so much for the review. Please see below. On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 6:16 PM Roman Danyliw via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-19: No Objection > > When responding, please keep