Hi Vijay,
I can also provide another review for performance-metrics. I see there have
been already two reviewers. Do we still need one more?
Thanks,
Jensen
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 2:53 PM Vijay Gurbani
wrote:
> Dear Danny: Excellent, and thank you for your time on this.
>
> We still need one
Hi Vijay,
I can also review the performance metrics document.
Best,
Kai
-Original Messages-
From:"Vijay Gurbani"
Sent Time:2020-09-30 02:53:35 (Wednesday)
To: "Danny Alex Lachos Perez"
Cc: "IETF ALTO"
Subject: Re: [alto] WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12
Dear
Dear Danny: Excellent, and thank you for your time on this.
We still need one more reviewer for performance-metrics and two for
path-vector.
All: Please step up.
Thank you.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 8:32 AM Danny Alex Lachos Perez <
dlachos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Jan & Vijay
>
> I will re
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 10:48 AM LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO <
luismiguel.contrerasmuri...@telefonica.com> wrote:
> Hi Vijay,
>
>
>
> My apologies for my lack of responsiveness, I have had a number of
> subsequent events impeding me to concentrate on this.
>
>
>
> My answer is yes, and I take Oc
Hello Jan & Vijay
I will review the Performance Metrics document.
Best regards,
Danny Lachos
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 1:42 PM Jan Seedorf wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> as discussed during the ALTO session at IETF-108, we are moving forward
> with all the remaining milestones.
>
> Thus, this email st
