Hi Ben,
Thank you so much for the wonderful, fast, thorough reviews! I understand
that Qin has already sent a reply and please see below.
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 7:58 PM Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <
nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
> Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
> dra
Hi Eric, Martin, all,
The authors agree that 8312bis should be a normative reference, and it is
in -v22, which we will upload soon.
Thanks,
Richard
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 8:52 AM Qin Wu
wrote:
> I agree with Martin, 8312bis should be listed as normative reference. We
> will correct this in v-
Hello Benjamin,
Thank you very much for your thorough review and guidance.
The present e-mail addresses your DISCUSS points and COMMENTS on section 10, as
they relate to a DISCUSS point.
Please see the responses inline.
The other COMMENTS and NITS will be addressed in a separate e-mail.
Best re
Thanks Ben for second review, good comments, see reply and clarification inline
below.
-邮件原件-
>发件人: Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org]
>发送时间: 2021年12月21日 8:58
>收件人: The IESG
>抄送: draft-ietf-alto-performance-metr...@ietf.org; alto-cha...@ietf.org;
>alto@ietf.org; i
I agree with Martin, 8312bis should be listed as normative reference. We will
correct this in v-22.
-Qin
发件人: alto [mailto:alto-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Martin Duke
发送时间: 2021年12月20日 23:27
收件人: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
抄送: alto-chairs ;
draft-ietf-alto-performance-metr...@ietf.org; The IESG ; IETF
AL
