[alto] [IANA #1230654] [Errata Verified] RFC7285 (6876)

2022-05-14 Thread Amanda Baber via RT
Hi, The headers for the affected registries now read as follows: ALTO Cost Metrics Registration Procedure(s): IETF Review Reference: [RFC7285][RFC Errata 6874] Note: Identifiers prefixed with 'priv:' are reserved for Private Use (see [RFC7285], Section 10.6). ALTO Endpoint Property Types Regist

Re: [alto] [IANA #1230654] [Errata Verified] RFC7285 (6876)

2022-05-14 Thread Sebastian Kiesel
Hi, On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 07:58:06PM +, Amanda Baber via RT wrote: > Hi all, > > This question relates to both 6874 and 6876: > > Should "priv:" be removed from the ALTO Cost Metrics and ALTO Endpoint > Property Types registries? See > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/alto-protocol >

Re: [alto] [IANA #1230654] [Errata Verified] RFC7285 (6876)

2022-05-14 Thread Martin Duke
yes, I believe that is correct. On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 12:58 PM Amanda Baber via RT wrote: > Hi all, > > This question relates to both 6874 and 6876: > > Should "priv:" be removed from the ALTO Cost Metrics and ALTO Endpoint > Property Types registries? See > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/

[alto] [IANA #1230654] [Errata Verified] RFC7285 (6876)

2022-05-14 Thread Amanda Baber via RT
Hi all, This question relates to both 6874 and 6876: Should "priv:" be removed from the ALTO Cost Metrics and ALTO Endpoint Property Types registries? See https://www.iana.org/assignments/alto-protocol If so, should we add the note "Note: Identifiers prefixed with 'priv:' are reserved for Pri