Hi Martin,
I'm holding the revision -17 as there is a GENART LC review. I will submit once
the proposed change is acked or there is no respond before Saturday night.
Best,
Kai
-Original Messages-
From:"Martin Duke"
Send time:Thursday, 10/19/2023 21:20:47
To: kai...@scu.edu.cn
Cc: d
Hi Linda,
Different clients can request different incremental updates and the load
balancing is applied to all requests. However, here the issue is mainly for a
single user whose requests may be distributed through different HTTP
connections (and eventually different TCP connections). The argum
Hi Scott,
Many thanks for catching the typo. The -15 version should fix it.
Thanks,
Jensen
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 7:53 AM Scott Rose via Datatracker
wrote:
> Reviewer: Scott Rose
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> There does not appear to be any change to the text that relates how the
> DN
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang-15.txt is now available. It is a work
item of the Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) WG of the IETF.
Title: YANG Data Models for the Application-Layer Traffic Optimization
(ALTO) Protocol
Authors: Jingxuan Jensen Zhang
Dhruv D
Reviewer: Scott Rose
Review result: Ready with Nits
There does not appear to be any change to the text that relates how the DNS RRs
are to be provisioned and queried. So the review from the -12 version still
applies. This draft does not impact the DNS protocol and is ready in that
respect.
I wil
Please make sure that there has been a reply to all of the Last Call
reviews.
___
alto mailing list
alto@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
Reviewer: Bob Halley
Review result: Not Ready
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-alto-new-transport.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area
Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just
like they would treat c
Sounds good to me.
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 10:34 PM wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> I would like to change the wording a bit to make sure they guidelines are
> interpreted as applicable only when the resources are sufficient:
>
>
> OLD:
>
> If resources allow, servers SHOULD avoid closing TIPS views tha