[alto] Comments on draft-ietf-alto-new-transport-08

Hi, all Notice that Jordi was asking for volunteers to review ALTO WG documents, I tried to spend some time reviewing this ALTO new transport document and my comments are following. Note that some of my questions/comments may be due to my not fully understanding of this document(sorry!)...

Re: [alto] Proposed Agenda for Interims #2-5

and receive your further comments via either Github or mailing list. Yes, I would be glad to present during next Tuesday’s ALTO weekly meeting, thank you for arranging this! Best Regards, Qiufang From: Jordi Ros Giralt [mailto:j...@qti.qualcomm.com] Sent: Friday, May 5, 2023 10:15 PM To: maqiufang

Re: [alto] Proposed Agenda for Interims #2-5

Hi, Luis Thank you for getting back to me! Please see my reply inline. From: LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO mailto:luismiguel.contrerasmuri...@telefonica.com>> Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2023 1:15 AM To: maqiufang (A) mailto:maqiufa...@huawei.com>>; Jensen Zhang mailto:jingxuan.n.zh.

Re: [alto] Proposed Agenda for Interims #2-5

Hi, Luis and all Thanks for this effort. Jensen and Kai, I think your proposals make sense to me, maybe could be reflected on the shared spreadsheet? I’ve Just added one more potential data source to the spreadsheet: LMAP (Large-Scale Measurement of Broadband Performance, RFC7594) network

Re: [alto] IPR poll: draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang

Hi, No, I am not aware of any IPR applied to this document. Best Regards, Qiufang From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com [mailto:mohamed.boucad...@orange.com] Sent: Monday, February 27, 2023 9:58 PM To: draft-ietf-alto-oam-y...@ietf.org Cc: 'alto@ietf.org' Subject: IPR poll:

Re: [alto] I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang-03.txt

Hi, Jensen BTW. There seems to exist some revision inconsistence warnings: libyang warn: File name "ietf-alto-st...@2022-07-11.yang" does not match module revision "2023-02-10". libyang warn: File name

Re: [alto] I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang-03.txt

Hi, Jensen, all I have reviewed the new version today, and following are some of my further comments: Regarding sec.5.4.3, I am not sure if the authentication choice is needed. A grouping named alto-server-listen-stack-grouping is defined in the document and uses http-server-parameters and

Re: [alto] Comments on data source configuration in alto-oam

-netconf-restconf-client-server/ [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8639 [4] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8071/ Best Regards, Qiufang From: Jensen Zhang [mailto:jingxuan.n.zh...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 20, 2023 10:56 AM To: maqiufang (A) Cc: alto@ietf.org; draft-ietf-alto

[alto] Comments on data source configuration in alto-oam

Hi, all I had a chance to take a deeper look at this -02 version - not the other parts, but only the YANG model related to the data-source configuration, which I believe is the section 5.3.1 and Appendix A.1 in the current draft. Following are some contributor thoughts: * I like the

Re: [alto] Some comments on ietf-alto module defined in draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang-00

Hi, Jensen [significant snipping] • For networkmap case, I don’t really understand “is-default” parameter defined here. If there are multiple network maps as the ALTO server resource, it would be good to allow to specify a default network map to interact with simple ALTO client which

Re: [alto] Some comments on ietf-alto module defined in draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang-00

Hi, Jensen Please see my reply inline. From: Jensen Zhang [mailto:jingxuan.n.zh...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 3:54 PM To: maqiufang (A) mailto:maqiufa...@huawei.com>> Cc: draft-ietf-alto-oam-y...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-alto-oam-y...@ietf.org>; alto@ietf.org<mailt

[alto] Some comments on ietf-alto module defined in draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang-00

Hi, all I have reviewed the draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang-00 draft today, and have got some comments regarding ietf-alto YANG module defined in the draft. Please feel free to reject/accept them: * The "hostname" parameter, the type of this leaf is defined as inet:host, just a reminder that

Re: [alto] Call for adoption: draft-zhang-alto-oam-yang

Hi, all I support the adoption of this draft which I believe provides a good starting point. The following are some comments, apologizes if I’ve missed something. 1. I still don't see any statistics related to R2 and R4 defined in Sec4.2. IMO it is important to record statistics related

[alto] Comments on draft-zhang-alto-oam-yang-01

Hi, authors, Thanks for writing this draft. As Adrian mentioned, there is no YANG code in this document. I tried to work it out according to the given YANG tree diagram. Please refer to the attachment, which I hope can help to make this work more complete. In general, I think the scope still