Hi, On 2010-5-21, at 4:05, wangaijun wrote: > We have submitted the updated version of our draft about notification > mechanism at http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-sun-alto-notification-02.txt, > any comments are welcomed.
I find this proposal to be problematic. ALTO is not a signaling protocol, and extending it into a generic network-to-client notification mechanism is well beyond the chartered work. ALTO is meant to improve the initial peer selection. <add standard rant about using ALTO for congestion notification here> Lars
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
