Re: [alto] End of WGLC for update-sse; need reviews.

2019-12-18 Thread Jensen Zhang
Hi WG, Sorry for my late review. This document is quite long. But I think the overall write-up is clear enough. Please see my comments inline: Section 6.1., paragraph 3: >Hence, the event field of ALTO update message can include two sub- >fields (media-type and data-id), where the two

Re: [alto] End of WGLC for update-sse; need reviews.

2019-12-13 Thread Vijay Gurbani
Jensen: Excellent. Thank you! On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 9:04 AM Jensen Zhang wrote: > Hi Vijay and WG, > > I am reviewing the latest revision of SSE. I will post my review by > tonight. > > Thanks, > Jensen > > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 10:01 AM Vijay Gurbani > wrote: > >> Folks: The WGLC ended

Re: [alto] End of WGLC for update-sse; need reviews.

2019-12-13 Thread Jensen Zhang
Hi Vijay and WG, I am reviewing the latest revision of SSE. I will post my review by tonight. Thanks, Jensen On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 10:01 AM Vijay Gurbani wrote: > Folks: The WGLC ended for update-sse on Dec 8 [1]. However, we have had > absolutely no discussion on the mailing list about

[alto] End of WGLC for update-sse; need reviews.

2019-12-13 Thread Vijay Gurbani
Folks: The WGLC ended for update-sse on Dec 8 [1]. However, we have had absolutely no discussion on the mailing list about this draft after it was posted for WGLC. I am shepherding this draft, and as such, I will need at least one, and perhaps two, members from the WG who are not associated with