Re: [alto] ALTO Draft ReCharter WG review - extensible set of policy attributes(Internet mail)

2021-03-12 Thread Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
.@ietf.org>; Qin Wu mailto:bill...@huawei.com>>; IETF ALTO mailto:alto@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [alto] ALTO Draft ReCharter WG review - extensible set of policy attributes(Internet mail) Hi Sabine, Qin, Good discussions. I support the use cases of the design direction. One suggestion i

Re: [alto] ALTO Draft ReCharter WG review - extensible set of policy attributes

2021-03-12 Thread Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) Cc: Qin Wu ; IETF ALTO ; alto-cha...@ietf.org; alto-...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [alto] ALTO Draft ReCharter WG review - extensible set of policy attributes Hi Sabine, Qin, Good discussions. I support the use cases of the design direction. One suggestion is

Re: [alto] ALTO Draft ReCharter WG review - extensible set of policy attributes(Internet mail)

2021-03-11 Thread 熊春山
5:29 AM To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) Cc: alto-cha...@ietf.org; alto-...@ietf.org; Qin Wu ; IETF ALTO Subject: Re: [alto] ALTO Draft ReCharter WG review - extensible set of policy attributes(Internet mail) Hi Sabine, Qin, Good discussions. I support the use cases of

Re: [alto] ALTO Draft ReCharter WG review - extensible set of policy attributes

2021-03-11 Thread Y. Richard Yang
Hi Sabine, Qin, Good discussions. I support the use cases of the design direction. One suggestion is to look at the design in a slightly abstract, general framework. In particular, the abstract framework looks like this to me: - Ve: A set of "volatile" (ephemeral) variables; Ve tends to be small

Re: [alto] ALTO Draft ReCharter WG review - extensible set of policy attributes

2021-03-11 Thread Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
Hi Qin, To my knowledge, ALTO is not expected to provide real-time information. On the other hand is it very useful to convey abstracted information covering cellular networks and beyond, starting with edge. So an ALTO Server may want to approach real-time information but cannot commit to it. Th

Re: [alto] ALTO Draft ReCharter WG review - extensible set of policy attributes

2021-03-11 Thread Qin Wu
Sabine: Thanks for your clarification, I want to make sure the ALTO clients can express to the ALTO sever that they want real time data or not real time data. Also Alto server can express that the returned information is real time or not real time in the response message to the ALTO clients. Ar

Re: [alto] ALTO Draft ReCharter WG review - extensible set of policy attributes

2021-03-11 Thread Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
Hi Qin, Please see inline, Thanks Sabine From: Qin Wu Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 9:32 AM To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) ; IETF ALTO Cc: alto-cha...@ietf.org; alto-...@ietf.org Subject: RE: ALTO Draft ReCharter WG review - extensible set of policy attributes Hi, Sabine:

Re: [alto] ALTO Draft ReCharter WG review - extensible set of policy attributes

2021-03-11 Thread Qin Wu
Hi, Sabine: 发件人: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) [mailto:sabine.randriam...@nokia-bell-labs.com] 发送时间: 2021年3月11日 1:55 收件人: Qin Wu ; IETF ALTO 抄送: alto-cha...@ietf.org; alto-...@ietf.org 主题: RE: ALTO Draft ReCharter WG review - extensible set of policy attributes Hello ALTO WG, Re

Re: [alto] ALTO Draft ReCharter WG review - extensible set of policy attributes

2021-03-10 Thread Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
Hello ALTO WG, Regarding the proposed work item on "Protocol extensions to support a richer and extensible set of policy attributes in ALTO information update request and response" (GPE for short) , I would like to add the following: This work item can be useful, among others, to allow a UE get