On Apr 13, 2001, Joe Sauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am upgrading as soon as a get the new server. But the strangeness comes
> from the fact that I have two other RH 7.0 boxes and they don't complain.
Compare /etc/fstab on those boxes and the difference will become clear.
--
Alexandre Ol
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, John R. Jackson wrote:
> >ERROR: X.XXX.duke.edu: [can not access LABEL=/home (/home): No such file or
>directory]
> >...
> >(brought to you by Amanda 2.4.1p1)
> >...
> >Any suggestions?
>
> This is fixed in 2.4.2p2. You may also want the post-p2 patch at
> www.aman
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 at 4:30pm, Joe Sauer wrote
> I get the following error:
>
> ERROR: X.XXX.duke.edu: [can not access LABEL=/home
> (/home): No such
> file
> or directory]
> ERROR: X.XXX.duke.edu: [can not access LABEL=/ (/): No such file or
> directory]
> Client check: 26 hosts checked
>ERROR: X.XXX.duke.edu: [can not access LABEL=/home (/home): No such file or
>directory]
>...
>(brought to you by Amanda 2.4.1p1)
>...
>Any suggestions?
This is fixed in 2.4.2p2. You may also want the post-p2 patch at
www.amanda.org/patches.html.
>-Joe
John R. Jackson, Technical Software
I get the following error:
ERROR: X.XXX.duke.edu: [can not access LABEL=/home
(/home): No such
file
or directory]
ERROR: X.XXX.duke.edu: [can not access LABEL=/ (/): No such file or
directory]
Client check: 26 hosts checked in 1.788 seconds, 2 problems found.
(brought to you by Amanda 2
>On RedHat 7 with Amanda-2.4.2p2 rebuild from
>http://people.redhat.com/teg/ (reference list message 28027). ...
I'm not quite clear. Were you running Amanda before and have upgraded?
What part of the above is new and what was running before?
>planner:LOCKING=POSIX_FCNTL ...
>planner:
>Using a NFS mounted holding disk doesn't seem possible ...
I would consider that a feature :-). Why in the world would you drag
a bunch of dump images across the network to an Amanda server and then
send them back across the network, using NFS of all things, then turn
around and drag them back
Using a NFS mounted holding disk doesn't seem possible and I don't
understand exactly why. amdump writes to it fine but when amflush tries
to write to tape I get:
The dumps were flushed to tape dailies02.
*** A TAPE ERROR OCCURRED: [[writing file: Bad file number]].
It's not a bad tape or dri
On RedHat 7 with Amanda-2.4.2p2 rebuild from
http://people.redhat.com/teg/ (reference list message 28027). Having
the following issues with driver and planner.
Thanks. I'd really like to get a backup done, I don't like being
exposed like this.
Steve
/var/lib/amanda/amdump.# says:
amdump: s
* John R. Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 07:44:09AM -0500)
>>Or is it more a convenience (as in this case where picking the right
>>chunksize will have the load indeed split over multiple disks)
> The original intent was to support file systems that cannot handle files
> large
* Sreenivasa Rao Vadalasetty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 06:33:35PM
+0530)
> I have been using amanda for quite some time. I am now having huge
> data (around 60GB) to be backed up using amanda.I am not able to accomodate
> this much data onto my 35GB DLT tape. I am not even
Hi,
I have been using amanda for quite some time. I am now having huge
data (around 60GB) to be backed up using amanda.I am not able to accomodate
this much data onto my 35GB DLT tape. I am not even able to span it onto
multiple tapes using amanda since amanda doesn't seem to be supporting
>does the chunksize have any performance benefiot/penalty ?
No penalties I can think of at the 1 GByte level. If you went silly
and told it 100 KBytes, there is an additional 32 KByte header on each
chunk so you'd waste a tremendous amount of space, and I suppose at that
small a size there might
* John R. Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 07:06:20AM -0500)
>>Will that work ?
> No. I'm planning on getting a job in sales, so I'm just making all
> this up. :-)
Good ;)
>>If I specify a chunksize of 1G, and dump a 9G backup, will it stick 3
>>chunks on each of the 3 hildi
>It's in the comments in the example amanda.conf.
OK, I'll get those updated.
>Will that work ?
No. I'm planning on getting a job in sales, so I'm just making all
this up. :-)
>If I specify a chunksize of 1G, and dump a 9G backup, will it stick 3
>chunks on each of the 3 hilding disks ?
Not
* John R. Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 11:28:03AM -0500)
>>Im currently using a single (big) holding disk.
>>I have 2 smaller disks, that I'd like to use as holding disks.
>>
>>But the samller disks will not be able to hold the big 0 dumps.
>>
>>According to the docs, the hold
16 matches
Mail list logo
