Hi,
I'm intending to use tapeless backup to my hard drive. From the
mailing list, I see that I can use 2.4.2 (CVS amanda-242-tapeio) or
2.4.3 method. Which one is a better choice for production?
Due to some mail that explained the 2.4.2 method in detail, I'm
currently trying to use it. I've s
> Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
>
>
> You must give tar directory names, not disk devices. Rather than
> /dev/da0s1e you need to tell tar to backup /var or whereever that
> partition happens to be mounted. Modify your disklist to reflect this.
>
I also tried using the mountpoint, but I get the s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello
I have been using amanda for a few months without any problems but suddenly i
encountered a few. I do a level 0 dump everyday for all the machines on the
local network. There was no problem of "out of tape" before. I was hit with
the "out of
Sounds a lot like when my DLT failed last week. I got a few of the same errors. I
has Sun replace it and all is well once again. Good Luck!
adi wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello
> I have been using amanda for a few months without any problems but suddenly i
> enc
The header at the beginning of the amanda dump file says
to restore use
dd if= bs=32k skip=1 | /sbin/xfsrestore -f... -
However, this is producing errors from xfsrestore.
If you have used a dd into a piped xfsrestore under
SGI IRIX, could you email me the command?
amanda 2.4.1p1
TIA,
Anne Ha
>On Thursday 08 August 2002 14:07, Adam D. Read wrote:
>>Inetd, Xinetd are not options for me to use on my solaris boxen.
>Sorry, I missed that solaris thing.
Huh? xinetd should run just fine on SunOS 5.
* Anne M. Hammond ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20020812 18:54] thus spake:
> The header at the beginning of the amanda dump file says
> to restore use
> dd if= bs=32k skip=1 | /sbin/xfsrestore -f... -
>
> However, this is producing errors from xfsrestore.
and these would be?
>
>
