Marc W. Mengel on Thu 30/01 17:40 -0600:
I'm not talking about multiple writes to the same tape
happening at once. With a single parity tape, all writes
to any drive in the set block on writes from any of the
other drives, since they all wait on the same drive head
used to record parity
Hello
First of all, thanks to Joshua Baker-LePain for his answer. It helped me
well; now
Amanda is correctly configured, and runs properly.
My problem now is that I don't fully understand the notion of backup
level. And it seems
important to correctly understand it for amrecover, or more
Just wondering if RAIT would allow 'RAIT 1' type thing where you can write
two tapes at the same time (one goes offsite, for example). At the moment we
have to run a loopy dd script to copy the original tape..
How does Amanda deal with tape labels with RAIT then, does it check if both
tapes are
Hello all.
Is this the wrong list for asking such a question???
Thanks,
Jeffo.
- Original Message -
From: Jeffo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 2:21 PM
Subject: Amanda building failing
Hello all.
I wonder if anyone could give me a
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 11:52:18AM +0100, Gilles Bourcy wrote:
Hello
First of all, thanks to Joshua Baker-LePain for his answer. It helped me
well; now
Amanda is correctly configured, and runs properly.
My problem now is that I don't fully understand the notion of backup
level. And it
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 11:52:18AM +0100, Gilles Bourcy enlightened us:
Hello
First of all, thanks to Joshua Baker-LePain for his answer. It helped me
well; now
Amanda is correctly configured, and runs properly.
My problem now is that I don't fully understand the notion of backup
Hi Chris,
Could you send a backtrace?
In gdb, type 'where' after the Segmentation fault.
Could you also try to run amcheck with the MALLOC_CHECK_ variable set.
For more details on it, see the man page for malloc.
export MALLOC_CHECK_=2
Jean-Louis
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 02:46:53PM -0800,
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 at 8:42am, Jeffo wrote
Is this the wrong list for asking such a question???
Nope -- it's just that nobody had any ideas. ;)
What version of amanda are you trying to build. And what gcc version
(3.1?)?
--
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke
On Tuesday, February 18, 2003, at 09:49 PM, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:16:16PM -0500, Richard Morse wrote:
Apparently, add_include only iterates over the directories at the root
of the drive (which makes sense), but therefore, it won't find
anything
that matches
Hello
amcheck is giveing the error messsages below : -
ERROR: backup.terrasky.mu: [could not access /dev/hda5 (/usr): Permission
denied]
ERROR: backup.terrasky.mu: [could not access /dev/hda5 (/dev/hda5):
Permission denied]
I have verified the permissions on the /usr as follows: -
2 drwxr-xr-x
hi
I am using redhat8.0, amanda2.3.4-4, tapeless backup. It can, at least I
think it can, do backups. But I can't restore any files from it yet.
root@localhost tmp]#amrecover DailySet1
AMRECOVER Version 2.4.3 Contacting Server on localhost ...
amrecover: can not connect to localhost: Connection
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 at 7:11pm, Madhvi Gokool wrote
ERROR: backup.terrasky.mu: [could not access /dev/hda5 (/usr): Permission
denied]
ERROR: backup.terrasky.mu: [could not access /dev/hda5 (/dev/hda5):
Permission denied]
I have verified the permissions on the /usr as follows: -
2
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 at 10:44am, Qian Chen wrote
root@localhost tmp]#amrecover DailySet1
AMRECOVER Version 2.4.3 Contacting Server on localhost ...
amrecover: can not connect to localhost: Connection Refused
Is 'localhost root' in ~amanda/.amandahosts? Is amindexd and amidxtaped
allowed from
Hello
Got confused between the mount point and the device.
The amanda user is in the operator group and did not have permission on the
device
I have changed the device /dev/hd5 permission as follows : -
chmod +or /dev/hda5
I did not get any errors on the client host when i ran amcheck.
Results
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 at 8:35pm, Madhvi Gokool wrote
Got confused between the mount point and the device.
The amanda user is in the operator group and did not have permission on the
device
I have changed the device /dev/hd5 permission as follows : -
chmod +or /dev/hda5
I did not get any
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
_On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 at 10:44am, Qian Chen wrote
_
_ root@localhost tmp]#amrecover DailySet1
_ AMRECOVER Version 2.4.3 Contacting Server on localhost ...
_ amrecover: can not connect to localhost: Connection Refused
_
_Is 'localhost root' in
Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
Could you send a backtrace?
In gdb, type 'where' after the Segmentation fault.
Could you also try to run amcheck with the MALLOC_CHECK_ variable set.
For more details on it, see the man page for malloc.
export MALLOC_CHECK_=2
[9:23am] operator@Chris (~):
I´m using Gcc 3.1 while trying to build Amanda 2.4.3.
Already found the amhpfixdevs.h and after fixing some words ('chomp' to
'chop')
it worked. Is it a Perl version mismatch? (using Perl 4.8, old, I know)
- Original Message -
From: Jeffo [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: RE: Email Reports not being sent
Its when using the amdump... and it did work before.. I guess thats what's messing me up. I tried to retract my steps and find any changes along the way. Unfortunatly there werent any changes.
Stumped,
-Amro
-Original Message-
From:
I´m using Gcc 3.1 while trying to build Amanda 2.4.3.
Already found the amhpfixdevs.h and after fixing some words ('chomp' to
'chop')
it worked. Is it a Perl version mismatch? (using Perl 4.8, old, I know)
- Original Message -
From: Jeffo [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 03:30:55PM -0300, Jeffo wrote:
I´m using Gcc 3.1 while trying to build Amanda 2.4.3.
Already found the amhpfixdevs.h and after fixing some words ('chomp' to
'chop')
it worked. Is it a Perl version mismatch? (using Perl 4.8, old, I know)
Amanda doesn't need Perl
Just installed Perl 5.8... =)
- Original Message -
From: Dietmar Goldbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jeffo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: En: Amanda building failing
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 03:30:55PM -0300, Jeffo wrote:
Hi Jeffo,
The chg-scsi-chio program will not compile, it is not compiled on 2.4.4b1.
You can run 'make -k' and ignore the error for chg-scsi-chio
or you can comment the '#define HAVE_HPUX_SCSI_CHIO' line in config/config.h
Jean-Louis
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 03:30:55PM -0300, Jeffo wrote:
Another observation I noticed while examining the backups from 3-4 days
ago.
It appears that the first tape does contain data. The only spot that
doesn't have data is file 1. The tape header is there, file n = 2 appear
to all contain backups. This would explain why the subsequent tapes may
I am running amanda-2.4.1p1 with rehdat 7.3. The reason we are running
such a old release is that we needed to make special patches to work
with afs. These patches did not work with 2.4.2 and we are currently
trying to get them to work with 2.4.3. Anyway, here is my problem:
When I run
Those are the unix commands I am using. I don't know why script put so
much funny characters in it. I tried cleaning it up...
mt -f /dev/nst0 {rewind|fsf #|offline}
dd if=/dev/nst0 skip=1 bs=32k | tar tvf -
robin
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 at
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 02:47:15PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another observation I noticed while examining the backups from 3-4 days
ago.
[[ snip ]]
If I attempt to access file markers greater than 1, I don't have any
problems and there are no syslog messages. But if i attempt to
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 at 4:02pm, Qian Chen wrote
google found your post in 6/2002. $chkconfig --list showed the amandaidx
amidxtape were not running. I enabled them and was able to do $telnet
localhost amandaidx. amrecover would let me in now, i can see all the
files i want to extract and add
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
_On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 at 7:11pm, Madhvi Gokool wrote
_
_ ERROR: backup.terrasky.mu: [could not access /dev/hda5 (/usr): Permission
_ denied]
_ ERROR: backup.terrasky.mu: [could not access /dev/hda5 (/dev/hda5):
_ Permission denied]
_ I have verified
This is what I did at the shell...
# Pop in a tape.
% mt -f /dev/nst0 rewind
% mt -f /dev/nst0 fsf 1
% dd if=/dev/nst0 skip=1 bs=32k | tar tvf -
dd: reading `/dev/nst0': Input/output error
0+0 records in
0+0 records out
# Let's try another file marker on the same tape.
% mt -f /dev/nst0 rewind
%
I've been tinkering with my disklist entries. Right now, I'm using the
following setup to split a very large filesystem into a few manageable
chunks:
# Special large directories
kanga.honeypot.net /usr/share compressed-tar-with-excludes
-1 local
I am running amanda very successfully across the network and it works
well with numerous servers.
I have a Compaq DDS3.
Where I am having difficulty is on one of the fileservers. It has a
directory with over 300Gb of files. It would be very awkward to
subdivide this into directories as the
Hello
After changing the group of the user amanda to disk , when I run amcheck , I
ams till getiing the
Amanda Tape Server Host Check
-
ERROR: /dev/nst0: Permission denied
(expecting a new tape)
NOTE: skipping tape-writable test
Server check took 0.000 seconds
33 matches
Mail list logo
