On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Gregor Ibic wrote:
Hi
what version of amanda do u use?
Do u use it with the "pseudo changer device" chg-multi ?
amanda-2.4.4 can use the changer file with amrecover but it won't use
the device sent by the changer device.
Therefore it work for all changer except for the chg-
Jean helped me.
I set the amrecover_changer in amanda.conf to a string "changer"
and used
settape changer
in amrecover
and now it works great!
regards,
Gregor
DK Smith wrote:
I have sent the amflush command for the only degraded backup remaining.
It always comes back indicating there is nothing to write to tape.
What have you specified as "holdingdisk" in your config?
Go there and see if you find a directory named to a date "20030312" or
alike, and th
Brian Cuttler wrote:
I have one system, just one, that I do not run amanda on
but perform backups of. Its a Redhat Linux rel 7.2, code
name Inigma, kernel 2.4.9.3-1, with a DLT 8000 drive. We
are running out of tape during our nightly dump and can't
seem to figure out the correct drive parameters t
wab wrote:
One filesystem I'm trying to back up with AMANDA is really huge and I'm
encountering errors:
This filesystem is so huge, a level 0 is taking longer than 24 hours.
Any ideas on what could be going wrong? My best guesses:
1. The filesystem is just too big for TAR.
No, at the end of the tar
s out
amverify ProsaDaily
Thu Mar 13 01:29:36 CET 2003
Using device /dev/nst0
Volume PROSADAILY03, Date 20030313
Checked uranus.prosa.com.__janis_XEDAT98.20030313.0
Checked uranus.prosa.com.__janis_deplProgetti.20030313.0
Checked uranus.prosa.com.__janis_PROGETTISEMA$.20030313.0
Checked uranus.pros
We use amanda in the Centre. We backup up aprox. 25 Gb per day in a L9 Sun
Storedge connected to a Sun Server.-
Kind Regards.
_
Pablo Jejcic
Smartweb Senior system Administrator
School of Computing - Robert Gordon University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
T:44-(0)1224-262797
F:44-(0)1224-262790
__
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 11:59:45AM +, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> b) Have no intention of using it myself for my home computer, but wonder
> if its a variable option in a university department (~100 staff).
>
Well Amanda has several disadvantages:
- poor support for non Unix-like Operating sy
"wab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>Case in point... My department just approved the purchase of a $4,500
>Iomega NAS server, to replace our NT and Unix tape backup DLT drives. I
>will soon be facilitating the use of AMANDA to a NAS server Vs. a SCSI
>DLT Tape. I look forward to the challenge/opportun
It's AIX.
So is this I/O error referring to writing to tape, or reading the file
from disk? I'd much rather use tar than dump...
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Baker-LePain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ? gtar: Read error at byte 53808128, reading 10240 bytes, in file
> ./archive/www/acc
I have had a NAS go offline :-) forever, the most appropriate
speculation was that some part of the NAS was hit by a myon, ( as in
cosmic particle hits silicon ), also heavily raided systems go bust due
to either bus issues ( all on the bus is not on the disk if the power
goes ) or cache failu
It's obviously this I/O error that's causing the problem... the
filesystem is 67 gig (df -k says 67108864 1048-K blocks). The other
filesystems being backed up to the tape only are using 3-4% of tape
capacity... and it's a DLT 40/80. The compression ratio seems like all
this should fit on 1 tape:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 at 9:47am, wab wrote
> It's AIX.
>
> So is this I/O error referring to writing to tape, or reading the file
> from disk? I'd much rather use tar than dump...
Reading from disk -- check the client's system logs.
--
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Du
wab wrote:
It's obviously this I/O error that's causing the problem... the
filesystem is 67 gig (df -k says 67108864 1048-K blocks). The other
filesystems being backed up to the tape only are using 3-4% of tape
capacity... and it's a DLT 40/80. The compression ratio seems like all
this should fit o
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 at 9:53am, wab wrote
> It's obviously this I/O error that's causing the problem... the
> filesystem is 67 gig (df -k says 67108864 1048-K blocks). The other
> filesystems being backed up to the tape only are using 3-4% of tape
> capacity... and it's a DLT 40/80. The compression
While I am more than willing to grant that tapes are a LOT more durable than
powered-down IDE drives, I'd still tend to frown on people tossing backups of
critical information across the room.
Before I decided to go with a DDS-3 system, I looked long and hard at going the
backup-to-disk path.
Hello,
I've been attempting to set up Amanda 2.4.4 on my system and have run into some
problems.
As you all know, amanda cannot span large filesystems across multiple tapes. The
typical work around is to segment the disklist entries so that amanda can back up the
large file system in parts.
F
Just because your organization has gone to backups on multi-petabit NAS devices
doesn't mean you don't have a use for AMANDA. You still need something to drive that
NAS system and, I see nothing wrong with AMANDA for that purpose.
Yes, the NAS vendor (EMC?) is going to have a full blown softwa
> pantera /home/depot-af /home/depot {
> hard-disk-tar
> include "./[Aa-Ff]*"
> } 1
I'd be pretty much surprised if this include statement didn't mean
`include all files starting with either A, any character between a and
F, or f'. That's probably not what you meant to say
define tapetype ADR30 {
comment "OnStream DI-30 FAST Tape Drive"
length 14321 mbytes
filemark 0 kbytes
speed 1422 kps
}
--
Chris Fuhrman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pobox.com/~cfuhrman
Hi frinds and Amanda User's ...
Please ... Look ... I'm user of cart model TRAVAN NS20 for Full_bkp's,
but I don't know why the taper don't use the full capacity of these
tapes (20Gb).
The max utilization is in 10Gb ...
L
Could someone point me n the direction of some documents that describes the
best way of backing up Windows partitions ?
I've made/will made CDR backups (using power quests imagemagick) of the c:\
drives of the 3 machines, I only need to back up the 80G d:\ drives
Any pointers greatly appreciate
Hi. I've installed Amanda 2.4.4 on Redhat Linux 7.3. We are using a
Spectra Logic TreeFrog 2000. I've got the changer working in Amanda
and can read/write tapes using mt and tar. When I attempt to use
amlabel to label the tapes I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] daily]# amlabel -f daily D001
+ amlabe
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 at 3:30pm, Prods6 - AMANDA - Bkp Mannager wrote
> Hi frinds and Amanda User's ...
>
> Please ... Look ... I'm user of cart model TRAVAN NS20 for Full_bkp's,
> but I don't know why the taper don't use the full capacity of these
> tapes (20Gb).
> The max utilization is in 10Gb
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 12:37:14PM -0500, D. Keith Higgs wrote:
> Up sides: you can get as broad or fine grained as you want and you have
> the ability to impose user quotas. Use a little bit of clever scripting
> and you have a means of rotating backup files so you only keep the most
> recent ###
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 at 8:09pm, Gerhard den Hollander wrote
> Could someone point me n the direction of some documents that describes the
> best way of backing up Windows partitions ?
>
> I've made/will made CDR backups (using power quests imagemagick) of the c:\
> drives of the 3 machines, I only
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 at 2:09pm, Ron Bauman wrote
> Hi. I've installed Amanda 2.4.4 on Redhat Linux 7.3. We are using a
> Spectra Logic TreeFrog 2000. I've got the changer working in Amanda
> and can read/write tapes using mt and tar. When I attempt to use
> amlabel to label the tapes I get:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 03:30:00PM -0300, Prods6 - AMANDA - Bkp Mannager wrote:
> Hi frinds and Amanda User's ...
>
> Please ... Look ... I'm user of cart model TRAVAN NS20 for Full_bkp's,
> but I don't know why the taper don't use the full capacity of these
> tapes (20Gb).
> The max utilization
No. It's the same tape I'm able to write/read with tar. That's what is making it
frustrating.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Baker-LePain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 3:28 PM
To: Ron Bauman
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: amlabel returning "Read-only
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 02:09:54PM -0500, Ron Bauman wrote:
> Hi. I've installed Amanda 2.4.4 on Redhat Linux 7.3. We are using a
> Spectra Logic TreeFrog 2000. I've got the changer working in Amanda
> and can read/write tapes using mt and tar. When I attempt to use
> amlabel to label the ta
Hello,
In the Amanda FAQ, there is one question "How can I configure Amanda to
perform full backups on the weekend and incrementals on weekdays?". The
answer is "You can't."
It's unfortunate that the plan above is what I need. I need to run full
backup once a week, and incrementals on the othe
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
We are a french university and we use amanda to backup our unix system.
here is our configuration.
library DLT1 with 10 slots
650Go of backup with 70 hosts
our server is a dell poweredge 1650 with a Gigabit Card.
> Can anyone tell me if they use am
Prods6 - AMANDA - Bkp Mannager wrote:
Hi frinds and Amanda User's ...
Please ... Look ... I'm user of cart model TRAVAN NS20 for Full_bkp's,
but I don't know why the taper don't use the full capacity of these
tapes (20Gb).
The max utilization is in 10Gb ...
I'm not a user of travan tapes. Are
Well, there are a couple of options I can think of off the top of my head.
1. Use a second config file for the weekend backups and add the line:
strategy noinc
in the dumptype definition
2. Do a:
amadmin config force hostname
prior to running the weekly backups.
Wayne
Robert Hazbun wrote:
Anyway, my problem is that I am doing just this, but am running into the following
error:
pantera/home/depot-wz lev 0 FAILED [missing result for /home/depot-wz in
pantera response]
...
Upon looking in the amanda source to attempt to find out what's wrong, I found out
t
I previously worked at Florida International University in the Computer Science
department. We used amanda to back up the entire dept network which was several
hundred gigs. With a little reading, testing, and patience, you can get better results
from amanda than from a veritas system, IMHO.
Ro
Bao,
I don't know why the FAQ says that -- it's simply not true!
We currently have a setup similar to this: incremental every day and full backups
every other weekend.
The trick is to make 2 amanda configurations (say, 'Daily' and 'Archive').
Once you've got that you can just call amanda with
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 08:58:58AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> "wab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> >Case in point... My department just approved the purchase of a $4,500
> >Iomega NAS server, to replace our NT and Unix tape backup DLT drives. I
> >will soon be facilitating the use of AMANDA to a
Title: LoLita Resim ve Videolari
INDIR IZLE
INDIR IZLE
INDIR IZLE
INDIR IZLE
INDIR IZLE
INDIR IZLE
INDIR IZLE
INDIR IZLE
Title: Ev Yapimi Porno
Ev yapimi super porno filmler icin BURAYA
TIKLAYINIZ
(Bu hizmet kisa bir sure devam edecektir!)
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 01:06:08PM -0500, Steven Karel wrote:
> amanda 2.4.3 compiles fine for me on Mac OS X (10.2.4), while 2.4.4 does
> not. Not urgent, but thought I should report it somewhere. Details:
>
> Configured with
>
> ./configure --with-user=amanda --with-group=wheel
> --prefix=/u
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 12:21:20AM +, Aysel said:
> ozel_porno_video.mpeg.exe
Firstly, loser.
Secondly, why is this list open to spammers? Don't you have to subscribe
before you can post?
Thirdly, what kind of spammer would subscribe to a list, post a link to a
.EXE file and expect a bunch
42 matches
Mail list logo
