RE: Problems backing up large W2K drive

2003-07-25 Thread Gregor Ibic
i installed cygwin version and it is working ok. with cygwin version you can exclude what do you like, just like on linux installation. regards, gregor

can't recover data from backup with smbclient

2003-07-25 Thread Moliere Christian
Hello, I found this message in my report email below: /-- jupiter-ba //exploitsrvdc2/christian.moliere$ lev 0 STRANGE sendbackup: start [jupiter-backup://exploitsrvdc2/christian.moliere$ level 0] sendbackup: info BACKUP=/usr/bin/smbclient sendbackup: info RECOVER_CMD=/usr/bin/smbclient -f...

Falsche Adresse?

2003-07-25 Thread peterjung
Guten Tag. Wir hatten Sie bereits vor einigen Wochen angeschrieben und wollten Kontakt mit Ihrem Marketing- oder EDV Leiter aufnehmen. Möglicherweise ist das Mail bei Ihnen oder bei uns verloren gegangen. Kurze Frage: Wer ist bei Ihnen der richtige Ansprechpartner für

Re: can't recover data from backup with smbclient

2003-07-25 Thread Paul Bijnens
Moliere Christian wrote: ? NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND opening remote file \profil\Application Data\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Quick Launch\Démarrer Internet Explorer.lnk (\profil\Application Data\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Quick Launch\) ? NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND opening remote

amdump: [dump to tape failed, will try again] - amrestore borking

2003-07-25 Thread Andreas Ntaflos
Hello again, Still testing amanda for use in a production environment; tapeless operation seems to be working nicely, except for amdump sometimes. Backing up a directory /d on host mobilkom to the backup server backup. Every second run seems to go through smoothly, but for the others the

Re: can't recover data from backup with smbclient

2003-07-25 Thread Moliere Christian
Paul Bijnens wrote: Moliere Christian wrote: ? NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND opening remote file \profil\Application Data\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Quick Launch\Démarrer Internet Explorer.lnk (\profil\Application Data\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Quick Launch\) ?

Re: amanda inparallel not working on large filesystems

2003-07-25 Thread jason . walton
Hello, I have left this alone for a month now hoping all the various suggestions I received might help. Nothing did. Over the previous month, I have moved the backup onto seperate network cards, seperate networks, specifed spindles, increased the holding disc space, reduced the holding disc

Re: Problems backing up large W2K drive

2003-07-25 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 11:53:44PM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote: When using multiple excludes only the last one is remembered, unless you specify the append keyword to exclude like: exclude append ./pagefile.sys But!!! When using samba to backup a Windows share, the specification

HELLO, I have trouble with chg-scsi: wrong emubarcode number

2003-07-25 Thread Ashwin Bijur
I am experiencing a problem with chg-scsi. Whenever I execute "chg-scsi -inventory", I get back the following response: BarCode == 1 and emubarcode == 1 Our tape-changer is equipped with a bar code reader. I have set "havebarcode 1", "emubarcode 0" in the chg-scsi.conf file. But

Re: SuperDLT-320 Tapetype

2003-07-25 Thread Joshua D. Bello
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 03:18:02PM -0700, Joshua D. Bello wrote: Greetings! I am writing to find a good tapetype definition for a SDLT-160/320 changer that we have just purchased. I found no definitions in the FAQ-O-Matic or list archives. Thanks in advance! Well I bit the bullet and ran

Re: HELLO, I have trouble with chg-scsi: wrong emubarcode number

2003-07-25 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 12:32:50PM -0400, Ashwin Bijur wrote: I am experiencing a problem with chg-scsi. Whenever I execute chg-scsi -inventory, I get back the following response: BarCode == 1 and emubarcode == 1 This is saying you are claiming to have a barcode reader and asking chg-scsi

Re: SuperDLT-320 Tapetype

2003-07-25 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 09:42:31AM -0700, Joshua D. Bello wrote: On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 03:18:02PM -0700, Joshua D. Bello wrote: Greetings! I am writing to find a good tapetype definition for a SDLT-160/320 changer that we have just purchased. I found no definitions in the FAQ-O-Matic or

Re: strange disk offline error

2003-07-25 Thread Kurt Yoder
So I'm still getting the disk offline error, and seeing this in my /tmp/amanda/sendsize...debug: sendsize: debug 1 pid 502 ruid 19 euid 19: start at Fri Jul 25 14:24:16 2003 sendsize: version 2.4.4 sendsize[502]: time 0.026:

Örgü Þiþleri Knitting Needles

2003-07-25 Thread Hobi Perle
Title: HOB HOB PERLE KNITTING NEEDLES - EL RG LER HOBI PERLE EL ORGU SISLERI El Orgu Sislerinde Yeni Bir Stil yeni bir Kalite! Eger kaliteli ve uygun fiyata el orgu

amrecover index Problem

2003-07-25 Thread Yogish
Hi I have some problems regarding amrecover. I have enable amanda,amidex and amandaidx and have put the line amanda dgram udp wait Amanda /PATH/libexec/amandad amandad in/etc/xinetd.d ,however I get the following errors after I get into amrecover. 501 no index records for the host. But I

Re: HELLO, I have trouble with chg-scsi: wrong emubarcode number

2003-07-25 Thread Ashwin Bijur
I commented "emubarcode 1" in the chg-scsi.conf file and now I don't get that error anymore. Thank you very much, Jon. Jon LaBadie wrote: On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 12:32:50PM -0400, Ashwin Bijur wrote: I am experiencing a problem with chg-scsi. Whenever I execute "chg-scsi

Linux disks and disklist file

2003-07-25 Thread Chris Miller
Hello, we recently added some Linux servers to our mix of *BSD servers. The server is running FreeBSD 4.7p10 with amanda 2.4.4 (from /usr/ports, looks like it's the base release, i.e. not the latest) and the clients are running RedHat Linux 7.3 with amanda-client-2.4.2p2-7. When running

Re: Linux disks and disklist file

2003-07-25 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 02:46:31PM -0700, Chris Miller wrote: Hello, we recently added some Linux servers to our mix of *BSD servers. The server is running FreeBSD 4.7p10 with amanda 2.4.4 (from /usr/ports, looks like it's the base release, i.e. not the latest) and the clients are

Re: amrecover index Problem

2003-07-25 Thread Frank Smith
--On Friday, July 25, 2003 14:10:10 -0600 Yogish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I have some problems regarding amrecover. I have enable amanda,amidex and amandaidx and have put the line amanda dgram udp wait Amanda /PATH/libexec/amandad amandad in/etc/xinetd.d ,however I get the following

RE: Linux disks and disklist file

2003-07-25 Thread Bernhard Beck
Chris, Amanda 2.4.2 as packaged in RedHat 7.x has trouble mapping the simple device name to the root disk. Use / instead of sda3 in the disklist, i.e. host / comp-root-index Bernhard -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chris Miller Sent:

Re: amrecover index Problem

2003-07-25 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 25 July 2003 16:10, Yogish wrote: Hi I have some problems regarding amrecover. I have enable amanda,amidex and amandaidx and have put the line amanda dgram udp wait Amanda /PATH/libexec/amandad amandad in/etc/xinetd.d I've no idea what you are saying above but please compare this

Re: Linux disks and disklist file

2003-07-25 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 25 July 2003 17:56, Jon LaBadie wrote: On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 02:46:31PM -0700, Chris Miller wrote: Hello, we recently added some Linux servers to our mix of *BSD servers. The server is running FreeBSD 4.7p10 with amanda 2.4.4 (from /usr/ports, looks like it's the base release,