In Red hat 8 amanda
2.4.2p1 is already installed with Amanda user I have only problem with
permission on the tape device.
Amanda cannot dump with root login when I SU to Amanda and try
amdump it gives me permission denied error after
checking amcheck.
Also with sudo it will not work
beca
I upgraded my Amanda port on FreeBSD, and inadvertently lost the
modification to chg-chio that fixed a bug I found. Here's the error
message:
bash$ sudo -u operator /usr/local/sbin/amtape twilley update
amtape: scanning all 6 slots in tape-changer rack:
slot 2: date 20030704 label twilley010
slot
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 03:49:50PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Anyway, I did a small backup to tape and now am having trouble restoring
>
> I am using tar and this is the restore command
> and it says it cannot find the file when I know
> it was there...
>
> Is this correct?
>
> amr
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 03:45:30PM -0400, Lauri Bettencourt wrote:
> At 05:38 PM 8/1/2003 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >On Friday 01 August 2003 16:41, Lauri Bettencourt wrote:
> >>Hello:
> >>
> >>Any asssistance anyone could offer would be greatly
> >>appreciated. :-)
>
> >>
> >>ls -al /home/aman
On Monday 04 August 2003 15:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I found out what the problem was..
>
>after checking things in archives and other
>mailings, I noticed references to amandad and
>client, I checked my install again and i did not
>have the client installed!!!
>
>I installed the rpm file and
On Monday 04 August 2003 14:48, Albert Hopkins wrote:
>On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 11:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> hello,
>>
>> I only want to back up local filesystems...
>> How can I bypass amanda from going through the
>> network to backup the filesystem that are just
>> local to the amanda server
On Monday 04 August 2003 11:28, Bob Zahn wrote:
>I have a couple of Seagate Ultrium 100/200GB tape drives in a
> Sun/Quantum ATL L25 tape library. When I try to run hardware
> compression (/dev/rmt/0hbn) on them I still can only fit 100GB of
> data according to Amanda. I ran amtapetype and got the
On Monday 04 August 2003 10:36, Byarlay, Wayne A. wrote:
>Hey, AMANDA is part of Red Hat! so this isn't just a Unix forum.
Only by means of red hat distributing a very long in the tooth, oddly
configured set of binaries in their distro. And while there are
those that have used those rpms, the m
I found out what the problem was..
after checking things in archives and other
mailings, I noticed references to amandad and
client, I checked my install again and i did not
have the client installed!!!
I installed the rpm file and the amcheck ran fine
however, why did not amcheck complain about
At 05:38 PM 8/1/2003 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Friday 01 August 2003 16:41, Lauri Bettencourt wrote:
>Hello:
>
>Any asssistance anyone could offer would be greatly
>appreciated. :-)
>
>I recently had to restore the directory where my
>amanda user was and have not been able to get amcheck
>to wo
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 12:53:28PM -0500, Bruntel, Mitchell L, SOLCM wrote:
> Here;s the question:
> Should amanda be advancing the tape every time it runs amcheck like this?
> in my changer, tapes 1-30 are amanda labeled tapes
>
> (background I have a 80 slot tape changer.)
> My amcheck Host say
Perhaps you are concerned that Amanda treats the local system the same
as the others and that the traffic may be going down the network stack
and getting looped backed up?
Why are you worried about this? More and more unix software is built
this way (X windows for one), so why should we be worrie
On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 11:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hello,
>
> I only want to back up local filesystems...
> How can I bypass amanda from going through the
> network to backup the filesystem that are just
> local to the amanda server anyway?
Am I missing something? Can't you just remove the
Question: Did i a message right before that said
changer: got exit: 0 str: 40 81 1 0
that this string stood for "Current drive, max # slots, first slot, ***CAN DRIVE go
backwards ***??
That would explain this behavior I think, but I didnt see it in chg-scsi.conf
Mitch
amcheck: debug 1 pid 1
Original question: Why still getting permission denied, even though group ownership
is set...
Mitch
Solution: Permissions. (or what advice would you give to "THE Graduate" if it took
place today, rather than 40 years ago?"
-Original Message-
From: Jay Lessert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jay set me straight, and suggested I look at the file permissions.
thanks in advance
Here;s the question:
Should amanda be advancing the tape every time it runs amcheck like this?
in my changer, tapes 1-30 are amanda labeled tapes
(background I have a 80 slot tape changer.)
My amcheck Host says:
Amanda Tape Server Host Check
-
Holding disk /dump: 89721
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 12:32:12PM -0500, Bruntel, Mitchell L, SOLCM wrote:
> Question: getting permission denied..but..
> Amanda runs as AMANDA/operator (solaris 2.8)
> DUMP /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s3 0 OPTIONS |;auth=bsd;compress-fast;
> ERROR [could not access /dev/rdsk/c0t0d0s3 (/dev/dsk/c0t0d0s3):
Question: getting permission denied..but..
Amanda runs as AMANDA/operator (solaris 2.8)
Here is my disklist
**
# sample Amanda2 disklist file, derived from CS.UMD.EDU's disklist
# see disklist.original for original
#
# tape host itself tape.control.att.com
# always-full
tape.control.att.c
Hi
Today I noticed something weired: amcheck/amdump requests
one tape (according to the list in tapelist) while amflush
requests a different one. Which brings up the question:
how does amflush decide which tape it is supposed to flush
backups to?
Paolo
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:28:29AM -0500, Bob Zahn wrote:
> I have a couple of Seagate Ultrium 100/200GB tape drives in a Sun/Quantum
> ATL L25 tape library. When I try to run hardware compression
> (/dev/rmt/0hbn) on them I still can only fit 100GB of data according to
> Amanda. I ran amtapetyp
FROM: Dr.Aaron Onah Odeh
Federal Ministry of Aviation
(FMA)Lagos, Nigeria.
URGENT&CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS PROPOSAL
Dear Sir,
It is my humble pleasure to write this letter irrespective of the fact
that you do not know me. However,
I came to know of you in my private search for a reliable and
tr
I have a couple of Seagate Ultrium 100/200GB tape drives in a Sun/Quantum
ATL L25 tape library. When I try to run hardware compression
(/dev/rmt/0hbn) on them I still can only fit 100GB of data according to
Amanda. I ran amtapetype and got the following:
define tapetype ATL-LTO1 {
directory.
20030712: found Amanda directory.
20030804: found Amanda directory.
Scanning /export/home/amanda/dumps/daily...
20030804: found Amanda directory.
Multiple Amanda directories, please pick one by letter:
A. 20030704
B. 20030706
C. 20030712
D. 20030804
Select directories to f
Hey, AMANDA is part of Red Hat! so this isn't just a Unix forum.
Anyway, I need my Windoze machine so I can play games like Battlefield 1942.
Oh yeah, and work, too.
OK Back to Topic. sorry for ths spam.
-Original Message-
From: Marc Rassbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, Aug
I ran
into this problem with Tru64 UNIX and the vdump command used by Amanda on that
platform. I added a line to the "re_table" structure in
client-src/sendbackup-dump.c to match the output of that command that was not
being matched by the existing entries. I am not aware of any ability t
I am about to upgrade my tape drive from DLT to SDLT on a
dell poweredge 2600 running redhat 7.3. Besides changing my tapetype
definition, is there anything else I should do?
I am running
build: VERSION="Amanda-2.4.3"
BUILT_DATE="Fri
Apr 4 10:37:17 EST 2003"
BUILT_M
I have added a wrapper to /sbin/dump to lock and unlock my vobs.
The output from my script (which I send to stderr) is flagged by Amanda as “strange
output”, for example…
FAILED AND STRANGE DUMP
DETAILS:
/--
lux2 sda5 lev 1 STRANGE
sendbackup: start [lux2:sda5
level 1]
sendb
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Axel Haenssen wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> What's there to advise about. Just hope that everybody has his/her
> system all patched and antivirus definitions up to date. Plus, this
> only con
It is a concern to many of us forced to use Windows systems to read our
e-mail, because of corporate decisions on "Standardized Desktops" (can you
say "High-risk computing environment for communicable diseases"). I long
for the day when I can run my standardized Linux desktop, shrugging off most
o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What's there to advise about. Just hope that everybody has his/her
system all patched and antivirus definitions up to date. Plus, this
only concerns windows user. Since we are a mostly linux forum we
c
Title: Virus alert
I have noted several instances of the following message.
Receiver, InterScan has detected virus(es) in the e-mail attachment.
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 13:42:09 -
Method: Mail
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
File: message.zip
Action:
Receiver, InterScan has detected virus(es) in the e-mail attachment.
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 13:42:09 -
Method: Mail
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
File: message.zip
Action: clean failed - deleted
Virus: WORM_MIMAIL.A
>> O e-mail enviado para você <<<
De / Assunto
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / your account zuuziaii
foi encontrado um vírus no arquivo Anexado,
e este vírus, não foi enviado para você.
Informações sobre o Vírus:
+++ Virus
Action Taken:
The attachment was quarantined from the message and replaced with a text
file informing the recipient of the action taken.
To:
Amanda-users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
-1588819584,29579903
Subject:
your account zuuz
Incident Information:-
Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipients: Amanda-users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:your account zuuziaii
WARNING: The file message.zip you received was infected with the
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus. The file attachment was not
Antigen for Exchange found message.zip matching FILE FILTER= message.zip file filter.
The file is currently Removed. The message, "your account
zuuziaii", was
sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and was discovered in SMTP Messages\Inbound
located at NTU/GINTIC/MOLLY.
Ereignisinformation:-
Urheber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Empfõnger: Amanda-users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Betreff:your account zuuziaii
WARNUNG: Die empfangene Datei message.zip ist mit dem Virus W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
infiziert. Der Dateianhang konnte nicht erfolgreich gesõube
Hello there,
I would like to inform you about important information regarding your
email address. This email address will be expiring.
Please read attachment for details.
---
Best regards, Administrator
zuuziaii
message.zip
Description: Zip compressed data
I have experiencered this problem under Solaris.
It seemed to be an inetd problem.
I have found a workaround to enable amcheck all the same :
Under solaris client I "truss" the inetd daemon and I try other port than
amanda port (like ftp)
so I run "ftp solaris_client_name" and I look at the "truss
>
> > I have only started using Amanda a couple of days ago to backup some
> clients
> > in our local network. Everything seemed to be working fine. However,
> > occasionally (about 50% of the times) amcheck times out ("selfcheck
> request
> > timed out. Host down?"). When I check /var/log/messa
41 matches
Mail list logo
