Lucio a écrit :
Two problems (maybe related):
1 - I've got two failed backups in the holding disk. I do not want to
flush them on tape for a number of reasons, one being because they aren't
useful anymore.
I'm perhaps wrong, but what I do in that case is :
$ rm -fr
Hi,
Sorry for the delay in replying (over a week), I got pulled to
another site for a week.
I'm going to combine the results of a few peoples suggestions
into this same email. Thanks for the help thus far.
Things I have done:
1. Created an /etc/stinit.def file so that the block size is set
to
Lucio a écrit :
1 - I've got two failed backups in the holding disk. I do not want to
flush them on tape for a number of reasons, one being because they aren't
useful anymore.
$ rm -fr /somewhere/holdingDisk/Dailyset1/*
$ amcleanup Dailyset1
Does amcleanup fix the index as well? Will
FROM: FROM: BARRISTER FELIX OKOBI.
ISAKOCO INNEH LAW FIRM
ATTORNEYS/LEGAL PRACTITIONER
NIGERIA
DEAR FRIEND,
COMPLIMENTS OF THE SEASON. GRACE AND PEACE AND LOVE FROM THIS PART OF THE ATLANTIC TO
YOU. I HOPE MY LETTER DOES NOT CAUSE YOU TOO MUCH EMBARRASSMENT AS I WRITE TO YOU IN
GOOD FAITH
In case anyone requires this in the future
define tapetype AIT-2 {
comment just produced by tapetype prog (hardware compression off)
length 48898 mbytes
filemark 2788 kbytes
speed 7710 kps
}
Tom
Digging further in amdump log, I think amanda fails to get
estimate size for the shares (shows 0) which are seen failing
below.
Here is part of what amdump log looks like:
setup_estimate: localhost:/h: command 0, options:
last_level -1 next_level0 -12341 level_days 0
getting estimates 0
One for the archives.
define tapetype HP-Ultrium-1 {
comment HP Ultrium 1 (100G uncompressed) Tape
length 101376 mbytes
filemark 0 kbytes
speed 13878 kps
}
Cheers,
Mike
--
| Mike Grice Unmetered ADSL solutions
| Operations Support Analyst for Home
This is what I understoond by the terms dumpcycle, runspercycle
tapecycle. Please correct me if I have misunderstood these terms.
dumpcycle 2 weeks:
Full backups of all shares will be done once in every 2
weeks (or 10 days - excluding weekends (sat/sun))
runspercycle 10:
amdump runs 10 days a
I'm working with someone who has a situation reversed from
what I am accustomed, a single Solaris system that needs
to be backed up to a PC network.
The Solaris system has no tape unit. The PC side has a
good amount of network shared storage and is backed up
to tape regularly. So it
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 05:58:26PM +0530, Rohit enlightened us:
This is what I understoond by the terms dumpcycle, runspercycle
tapecycle. Please correct me if I have misunderstood these terms.
dumpcycle 2 weeks:
Full backups of all shares will be done once in every 2
weeks (or 10 days -
Title: SAHNEDEN
Sahne & Blten, zlem Gzel Bale ve Mzik Okulu
ile Sahne Gsteri Sanatlar tarafndan her ay hazrlanan bir kltr
ve sanat bltenidir.
Bale, modern dans ve klasik mzik konularnda
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 09:23:47AM -0400, Matt Hyclak wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 05:58:26PM +0530, Rohit enlightened us:
This is what I understoond by the terms dumpcycle, runspercycle
tapecycle. Please correct me if I have misunderstood these terms.
dumpcycle 2 weeks:
Full
As we're speaking about terminology, there are things I don't understand
as english is not my native language :
Amongst them, I don't understand the term due. Could anyone explain me
this word with some other simple words ?
When I type amadmin DailySet1 due, I get :
Due in 8 days:
due, payable, owed, expected
The bills are due to be payed this week.
As we're speaking about terminology, there are things I don't understand
as english is not my native language :
Amongst them, I don't understand the term due. Could anyone explain me
this word with some other simple
Brian Cuttler wrote:
due, payable, owed, expected
The bills are due to be payed this week.
Ok for due, I guess it means I will have to backup that host in two
days, and that other in three days.
But for overdue ? Does this mean I **will** have to backup that host
yesterday ? :o)
--
Nicolas
--On Thursday, October 16, 2003 17:58:26 +0530 Rohit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is what I understoond by the terms dumpcycle, runspercycle
tapecycle. Please correct me if I have misunderstood these terms.
dumpcycle 2 weeks:
Full backups of all shares will be done once in every 2
Nicolas Ecarnot wrote:
Brian Cuttler wrote:
due, payable, owed, expected
The bills are due to be payed this week.
Ok for due, I guess it means I will have to backup that host in two
days, and that other in three days.
But for overdue ? Does this mean I **will** have to backup that host
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 05:08:39PM +0200, Nicolas Ecarnot wrote:
Brian Cuttler wrote:
due, payable, owed, expected
The bills are due to be payed this week.
Ok for due, I guess it means I will have to backup that host in two
days, and that other in three days.
But for overdue ? Does
tapecycle 20 tapes:
number of tapes to use per dumpcycle of 2 weeks. 10 tapes X 2 dumpcycles
=
20 tapes.
Yes, but you really should have an extra tape or two in there to lessen
the chance of a failed backup overwriting your last full backup. You
should really consider doubling that
Tom,
If all goes well you will have at least one level 0 of each
partition during the dumpcycle.
With only a single dumpcycle of tapes in the tape pool you may
find that you lose your only level 0 if there are any problems,
ie: bad physical tape, need to do flushes, dirty drive...
How many
--On Thursday, October 16, 2003 16:25:48 +0100 Tom Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tapecycle 20 tapes:
number of tapes to use per dumpcycle of 2 weeks. 10 tapes X 2 dumpcycles
=
20 tapes.
Yes, but you really should have an extra tape or two in there to lessen
the chance of a failed
Frank,
Tom,
I was thinking the same thing, though where possible I have a
couple of extra anyway (2 x runs/cycle + N) for small values
of N.
Tom, whatever I said, ignore it, you are in reasonable good shape,
you have fallback.
--On Thursday, October 16, 2003 16:25:48 +0100 Tom Brown [EMAIL
To follow up on this a little further..could you address 'runtapes'? If I
set 'runtapes' to two or larger, then as long as every client dump is
smaller than one tape, amanda will pack it all on (if I don't have
tape/drive problems and don't hit the 'runtapes' limit first), is that true?
I assume
Dana,
I have a jukebox on a Solaris 9 system and I've configured runtapes
to 2 because I expect to shortly exceed the capacity of a single
tape (LTO [110/220 ??]) shortly.
So far all runs have completed on a single tape, ie the second tape
is only called into play when the first is 'filled'.
ilan gazetesi bayinizde sadece 500.000 TL, isteyiniz.
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 at 12:11pm, Dana Bourgeois wrote
To follow up on this a little further..could you address 'runtapes'? If I
set 'runtapes' to two or larger, then as long as every client dump is
smaller than one tape, amanda will pack it all on (if I don't have
tape/drive problems and
Tom,
you don't have it as dumpcycle*runspercycle.
In your two examples you have it as runspercycle period.
To demostrate the problem consider the simplest situation.
A dumpcycle of 1 day, a runspercycle of 1, and a tapecycle of 1.
Each amdump uses the ONLY tape containing the last level
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:25:48PM +0100, Tom Brown wrote:
tapecycle 20 tapes:
number of tapes to use per dumpcycle of 2 weeks. 10 tapes X 2 dumpcycles
=
20 tapes.
Yes, but you really should have an extra tape or two in there to lessen
the chance of a failed backup overwriting your
From: Mrs Serena Jones
PLEASE ENDEAVOUR TO USED IT FOR THE CHILDREN OF GOD.
I am the above named person from Kuwait. I am married to Dr.Harry Jones who
worked with Kuwait embassy in Ivory Coast for nine yearsbefore he died in
the year 2000.We were married for eleven years without a child. He died
Title: October
Complete Enterprise Fax/Email Solutions Software
MDX Fax/Email Service send one send tens of thousands
Incoming Fax to email service or software
Targeted Database customer contact lists
API-XML helps your CRM program link with
30 matches
Mail list logo
