On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 11:33:45AM +0530, Rohit wrote:
>
> I did few posts before expressing my concern about amanda not
> backing up few partitions. I realized that one of the reason
> could be that I put runspercycle as 5 weeks instead of 10
> runs before.
>
> I guess amanda was thinking that
Thanks everybody for clearing my doubt!
More doubts :-)
I did few posts before expressing my concern about amanda not
backing up few partitions. I realized that one of the reason
could be that I put runspercycle as 5 weeks instead of 10
runs before.
I guess amanda was thinking that it had appr
Title: October
Complete Enterprise Fax/Email Solutions Software
MDX Fax/Email Service send one send tens of thousands
Incoming Fax to email service or software
Targeted Database customer contact lists
API-XML helps your CRM program link with Broad
From: Mrs Serena Jones
PLEASE ENDEAVOUR TO USED IT FOR THE CHILDREN OF GOD.
I am the above named person from Kuwait. I am married to Dr.Harry Jones who
worked with Kuwait embassy in Ivory Coast for nine yearsbefore he died in
the year 2000.We were married for eleven years without a child. He died
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:25:48PM +0100, Tom Brown wrote:
> > > tapecycle 20 tapes:
> > > number of tapes to use per dumpcycle of 2 weeks. 10 tapes X 2 dumpcycles
> =
> > > 20 tapes.
> >
> > Yes, but you really should have an extra tape or two in there to lessen
> > the chance of a failed backup o
> Tom,
> you don't have it as dumpcycle*runspercycle.
> In your two examples you have it as "runspercycle" period.
>
> To demostrate the problem consider the simplest situation.
> A dumpcycle of 1 day, a runspercycle of 1, and a tapecycle of 1.
>
> Each amdump uses the ONLY tape containing the last
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 at 12:11pm, Dana Bourgeois wrote
> To follow up on this a little further..could you address 'runtapes'? If I
> set 'runtapes' to two or larger, then as long as every client dump is
> smaller than one tape, amanda will pack it all on (if I don't have
> tape/drive problems and d
ilan gazetesi bayinizde sadece 500.000 TL, isteyiniz.
Dana,
I have a jukebox on a Solaris 9 system and I've configured runtapes
to 2 because I expect to shortly exceed the capacity of a single
tape (LTO [110/220 ??]) shortly.
So far all runs have completed on a single tape, ie the second tape
is only called into play when the first is 'filled'.
On
To follow up on this a little further..could you address 'runtapes'? If I
set 'runtapes' to two or larger, then as long as every client dump is
smaller than one tape, amanda will pack it all on (if I don't have
tape/drive problems and don't hit the 'runtapes' limit first), is that true?
I assume t
Frank,
Tom,
I was thinking the same thing, though where possible I have a
couple of extra anyway (2 x runs/cycle + N) for small values
of N.
Tom, whatever I said, ignore it, you are in reasonable good shape,
you have fallback.
> --On Thursday, October 16, 2003 16:25:48 +0100 Tom Brown <[EMAIL PR
--On Thursday, October 16, 2003 16:25:48 +0100 Tom Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > tapecycle 20 tapes:
>> > number of tapes to use per dumpcycle of 2 weeks. 10 tapes X 2 dumpcycles
> =
>> > 20 tapes.
>>
>> Yes, but you really should have an extra tape or two in there to lessen
>> the chance
Tom,
If all goes well you will have at least one level 0 of each
partition during the dumpcycle.
With only a single dumpcycle of tapes in the tape pool you may
find that you lose your only level 0 if there are any problems,
ie: bad physical tape, need to do flushes, dirty drive...
How many more
> > tapecycle 20 tapes:
> > number of tapes to use per dumpcycle of 2 weeks. 10 tapes X 2 dumpcycles
=
> > 20 tapes.
>
> Yes, but you really should have an extra tape or two in there to lessen
> the chance of a failed backup overwriting your last full backup. You
> should really consider doubling
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 05:08:39PM +0200, Nicolas Ecarnot wrote:
> Brian Cuttler wrote:
> >"due", payable, owed, expected
> >
> >The bills are due to be payed this week.
>
> Ok for due, I guess it means I will have to backup that host in two
> days, and that other in three days.
>
> But for over
Nicolas Ecarnot wrote:
Brian Cuttler wrote:
"due", payable, owed, expected
The bills are due to be payed this week.
Ok for due, I guess it means I will have to backup that host in two
days, and that other in three days.
But for overdue ? Does this mean I **will** have to backup that host
ye
--On Thursday, October 16, 2003 17:58:26 +0530 Rohit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is what I understoond by the terms "dumpcycle", "runspercycle" &
> "tapecycle". Please correct me if I have misunderstood these terms.
>
> dumpcycle 2 weeks:
> Full backups of all shares will be done once
Brian Cuttler wrote:
"due", payable, owed, expected
The bills are due to be payed this week.
Ok for due, I guess it means I will have to backup that host in two
days, and that other in three days.
But for overdue ? Does this mean I **will** have to backup that host
yesterday ? :o)
--
Nicolas E
"due", payable, owed, expected
The bills are due to be payed this week.
> As we're speaking about terminology, there are things I don't understand
> as english is not my native language :
> Amongst them, I don't understand the term "due". Could anyone explain me
> this word with some other sim
As we're speaking about terminology, there are things I don't understand
as english is not my native language :
Amongst them, I don't understand the term "due". Could anyone explain me
this word with some other simple words ?
When I type "amadmin DailySet1 due", I get :
Due in 8 days: somehost.f
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 09:23:47AM -0400, Matt Hyclak wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 05:58:26PM +0530, Rohit enlightened us:
> >
> > This is what I understoond by the terms "dumpcycle", "runspercycle" &
> > "tapecycle". Please correct me if I have misunderstood these terms.
> >
> > dumpcycle 2
Title: SAHNEDEN
Sahne & Bülten, Özlem Güzel Bale ve Müzik Okulu
ile Sahne Gösteri Sanatları tarafından her ay hazırlanan bir kültür
ve sanat bültenidir.
Bale, modern dans ve klasik müzik k
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 05:58:26PM +0530, Rohit enlightened us:
>
> This is what I understoond by the terms "dumpcycle", "runspercycle" &
> "tapecycle". Please correct me if I have misunderstood these terms.
>
> dumpcycle 2 weeks:
> Full backups of all shares will be done once in every 2
> weeks
> I'm working with someone who has a situation reversed from
> what I am accustomed, a single Solaris system that needs
> to be backed up to a PC network.
>
> The Solaris system has no tape unit. The PC side has a
> good amount of network shared storage and is backed up
> to tape regularly. So
This is what I understoond by the terms "dumpcycle", "runspercycle" &
"tapecycle". Please correct me if I have misunderstood these terms.
dumpcycle 2 weeks:
Full backups of all shares will be done once in every 2
weeks (or 10 days - excluding weekends (sat/sun))
runspercycle 10:
amdump runs 10 d
One for the archives.
define tapetype HP-Ultrium-1 {
comment "HP Ultrium 1 (100G uncompressed) Tape"
length 101376 mbytes
filemark 0 kbytes
speed 13878 kps
}
Cheers,
Mike
--
| Mike Grice Unmetered & ADSL solutions
| Operations Support Analyst for Home
Digging further in amdump log, I think amanda fails to get
estimate size for the shares (shows 0) which are seen failing
below.
Here is part of what amdump log looks like:
setup_estimate: localhost:/h: command 0, options:
last_level -1 next_level0 -12341 level_days 0
getting estimates 0 (
In case anyone requires this in the future
define tapetype AIT-2 {
comment "just produced by tapetype prog (hardware compression off)"
length 48898 mbytes
filemark 2788 kbytes
speed 7710 kps
}
Tom
FROM: FROM: BARRISTER FELIX OKOBI.
ISAKO&CO INNEH LAW FIRM
ATTORNEYS/LEGAL PRACTITIONER
NIGERIA
DEAR FRIEND,
COMPLIMENTS OF THE SEASON. GRACE AND PEACE AND LOVE FROM THIS PART OF THE ATLANTIC TO
YOU. I HOPE MY LETTER DOES NOT CAUSE YOU TOO MUCH EMBARRASSMENT AS I WRITE TO YOU IN
GOOD FAITH BAS
> Lucio a écrit :
> > 1 - I've got two failed backups in the holding disk. I do not want to
> > flush them on tape for a number of reasons, one being because they aren't
> > useful anymore.
>
> $ rm -fr /somewhere/holdingDisk/Dailyset1/*
> $ amcleanup Dailyset1
Does amcleanup fix the index as well
Hi,
Sorry for the delay in replying (over a week), I got pulled to
another site for a week.
I'm going to combine the results of a few peoples suggestions
into this same email. Thanks for the help thus far.
Things I have done:
1. Created an /etc/stinit.def file so that the block size is set
to "
Lucio a écrit :
Two problems (maybe related):
1 - I've got two failed backups in the holding disk. I do not want to
flush them on tape for a number of reasons, one being because they aren't
useful anymore.
I'm perhaps wrong, but what I do in that case is :
$ rm -fr /somewhere/holdingDisk/Dailyse
ALHAJI AHMED BELLO
PLEASE SEND YOUR REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SIR/MA
MY NAME IS ALHAJI AHMED BELLO, THE MANAGER CREDIT AND
FOREIGN BILLS OF CREDITWATER HOUSEBANK OF MAURITUS .I AM WRITING IN
RESPECT OF A FOREIGN CUSTOMER OF MY BANK
WITH ACCOUNT NUMBER 14-255-2004/u
33 matches
Mail list logo
