On Wednesday 24 December 2003 14:34, vlad f halilow wrote:
>so, any addition notes for win32 backup. possibly it would be
>interesting for someone. there are three way to complete
>order.
>
>1) amanda-win32 client http://sourceforge.net/projects/amanda-win32/
>is a natie way. this soft is a port of
On Wednesday 24 December 2003 13:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Gene Heskett:
>>And I didn't even get his name right
>
>Funny stuff.
>
>My wife did a google on my email address recently - she saw some of
> my public gaffs in all their glory. Ouch . . . .
>
Yup, they CAN be that way if the occasion s
so, any addition notes for win32 backup. possibly it would be
interesting for someone. there are three way to complete
order.
1) amanda-win32 client http://sourceforge.net/projects/amanda-win32/
is a natie way. this soft is a port of amanda client to win32
platform. but project died(?) two yers ag
Gene Heskett:
>And I didn't even get his name right
Funny stuff.
My wife did a google on my email address recently - she saw some of my
public gaffs in all their glory. Ouch . . . .
Happy Holidays!
-
toby bluhm
philips medical systems, it
On Wednesday 24 December 2003 12:46, Gene Heskett wrote:
>On Wednesday 24 December 2003 11:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>Scott Mcdermott:
>>>record no
>>
>>Is the box saving any historical backup info? Can't do an inc if it
>> has nothing to compare with.
>>
>>/etc/amandates
>>/et
On Wednesday 24 December 2003 11:44, Scott Mcdermott wrote:
>Gene Heskett on Wed 24/12 11:04 -0500:
>> And samba isn't involved with amanda? I think I'd verify
>> that by shutting samba down for the next backup. Just for
>> grins :)
>
>how can it be? here is the DLE:
>
>diabolus2.rwc.questra.
On Wednesday 24 December 2003 11:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Scott Mcdermott:
>>record no
>
>Is the box saving any historical backup info? Can't do an inc if it
> has nothing to compare with.
>
>/etc/amandates
>/etc/dumpdates
>/usr/local/var/amanda/gnutar-lists/
Good Catch(tm),
Scott Mcdermott:
>There's stuff being saved in gnutar-lists definitely, but
>amandates is empty. I'm not using `dump' so does the
>`record' option matter?
Seems it does.
Looking at my system, /etc/amandates has entries for all dle's _except_
for the ones I have "record no"
> You can clea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed 24/12 10:41 -0600:
>
> >record no
>
>
> Is the box saving any historical backup info? Can't do an
> inc if it has nothing to compare with.
>
> /etc/amandates
> /etc/dumpdates
> /usr/local/var/amanda/gnutar-lists/
There's stuff being saved in gnutar-lis
Gene Heskett on Wed 24/12 11:04 -0500:
> And samba isn't involved with amanda? I think I'd verify
> that by shutting samba down for the next backup. Just for
> grins :)
how can it be? here is the DLE:
diabolus2.rwc.questra.com /export/finance tardump
and the dumptype from my amanda.conf:
Scott Mcdermott:
>record no
Is the box saving any historical backup info? Can't do an inc if it has
nothing to compare with.
/etc/amandates
/etc/dumpdates
/usr/local/var/amanda/gnutar-lists/
-
toby bluhm
philips medical sy
On Wednesday 24 December 2003 10:52, Scott Mcdermott wrote:
>Gene Heskett on Wed 24/12 10:47 -0500:
>> AFAIK, samba doesn't support those times. So you will, if
>> samba is the transport from client to server, get a full
>> backup of everything everytime. Or at least thats been my
>> experience w
Gene Heskett on Wed 24/12 10:47 -0500:
> AFAIK, samba doesn't support those times. So you will, if
> samba is the transport from client to server, get a full
> backup of everything everytime. Or at least thats been my
> experience with the samba 2.x family, and I have not yet
> installed 3.0, bas
On Wednesday 24 December 2003 10:00, Scott Mcdermott wrote:
>Gene Heskett on Wed 24/12 09:55 -0500:
>> What filesystem on the target, and what linkage/transport,
>> samba or amanda client?
>
>Amanda server is on the same machine as the client, it's
>backing up to itself with straight GNU tar. FS i
Gene Heskett on Wed 24/12 09:55 -0500:
> What filesystem on the target, and what linkage/transport,
> samba or amanda client?
Amanda server is on the same machine as the client, it's
backing up to itself with straight GNU tar. FS is ext3.
However, it is exported by SAMBA, if that has anything to
On Wednesday 24 December 2003 06:13, Scott Mcdermott wrote:
What filesystem on the target, and what linkage/transport, samba or
amanda client?
>I'm trying to figure out why Amanda doesn't seem to ever do
>incremental backups on any of my filesystems, even when I
>have promotions disabled.
>
>Her
Cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed 24/12 07:39 -0500:
> > 04:35:20 diabolus2 h77277 c11 j0 l4 s1 r0 [/export/finance]
> > $ sudo find finance/ -mtime -4 | wc -l
> > 0
>
> sorry, I should have mentioned.../export/finance contains
> only a single subdirectory, "finance/"
oh, and find -ctime -4
Cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed 24/12 07:36 -0500:
> 04:35:20 diabolus2 h77277 c11 j0 l4 s1 r0 [/export/finance]
> $ sudo find finance/ -mtime -4 | wc -l
> 0
sorry, I should have mentioned.../export/finance contains
only a single subdirectory, "finance/"
Gerhard den Hollander on Wed 24/12 13:28 +0100:
> * Scott Mcdermott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 06:13:21AM -0500)
>
> > HOSTNAME DISKLORIG-KB OUT-KB COMP%
> > MMM:SSKB/s MMM:SS
> > +KB/s
> > -
I'm trying to figure out why Amanda doesn't seem to ever do
incremental backups on any of my filesystems, even when I
have promotions disabled.
Here is an example of three successive runs for a particular
export I'm backing up. The three lines below represent
backups from days 2003122[012], and I
hmm.. time to time i think, that better way to backup windows host
with amanda is a 'cron' on win32, that running archivator and completely backup
data via nfs to unix server. amanda has'nt problem with backup it :) i
use it way, and it work fine.
--
Best regards,
vlad
21 matches
Mail list logo
