This does *not* appear to be Gene's problem of several days ago.
Yesterday, I reconfigured some disk, and reconfigured amanda to work
with the disk changes.
For nearly one year, I have used the following as a top level dumptype,
from which all others inherit:
define dumptype global {
c
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:07:34AM -0600, Michael D Schleif wrote:
> This does *not* appear to be Gene's problem of several days ago.
>
> Yesterday, I reconfigured some disk, and reconfigured amanda to work
> with the disk changes.
>
> For nearly one year, I have used the following as a top level
* Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004:01:28:10:28:28-0500] scribed:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:07:34AM -0600, Michael D Schleif wrote:
> > Now, since this addition, I get this:
> >
> ># sudo -u backup amcheck DailySet1 -cltw
> >Amanda Tape Server Host Check
> >---
--On Wednesday, January 28, 2004 10:28:28 -0500 Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> IIRC, amcheck does not run with the same root permissions as amdump.
> Thus it may not be able to get to the excluce file during an amcheck.
>
>From my experience this is indeed true. This makes the amch
Hi,
Amanda will always give an error if it can't access the exclude file unless
it's a ENOENT (no such file) with the optional option.
It's a configuration mistake, you told amanda to use a file and it can't
check if the file exist.
first solution: Change your DLE for this disk to remove the exc
Hi all,
I have an installation where Amanda
has been built by me (remember those annoying questions 'How do I execute
scripts from within Amanda' last year ? ;-) )
I would like to upgrade to 2.4.4; is
there anything I should keep in mind ?
(I still have my 'original' config statement
document
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:52:41AM -0600, Michael D Schleif wrote:
> * Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004:01:28:10:28:28-0500] scribed:
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:07:34AM -0600, Michael D Schleif wrote:
>
>
> > > Now, since this addition, I get this:
> > >
> > ># sudo -u backup amchec
selfcheck, sendsize and sendbackup are run on client as the amanda user.
They have the same permission.
It's only the backup program that is sometime run as root.
Jean-Louis
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:04:26AM -0600, Frank Smith wrote:
> --On Wednesday, January 28, 2004 10:28:28 -0500 Jon LaBad
* Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004:01:28:11:08:19-0500] scribed:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:52:41AM -0600, Michael D Schleif wrote:
> > Ironically, I do _not_ need any exclude file for this DLE. Initially, I
> > did not have any exclude file, and amcheck issued the _same_ error.
> > Then,
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:39:20AM -0600, Michael D Schleif wrote:
> * Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004:01:28:11:08:19-0500] scribed:
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:52:41AM -0600, Michael D Schleif wrote:
>
>
>
># ls -adl /usr/local/home/mds/mail
>drwxr-xr-x 19 mds mds
Is this being worked on and likely to happen anytime in the reasonably
near future? I really don't want to punch holes in my firewall if I
don't have to :)
Thanks,
--
Seeya,
Paul
GPG Key fingerprint = 1660 FECC 5D21 D286 F853 E808 BB07 9239 53F1 28EE
If you're not having fun, you'r
Hi,
though the question is fairly old I found the answer just now:
Gene Heskett wrote:
I've got a silly Q myself over this one, and the man page is no
help for this. But what does it mean when out in the future tense
columns, one gets an 01 or a 10 or a 1E. Samples from the rather
lengthy repo
I'm trying to backup the machine u07 from u07 (the one with the tape drive).
I'm getting a
ash-2.00$ amcheck daily
Amanda Tape Server Host Check
-
Holding disk /Disk2/AMANDA: 3376999 KB disk space available, that's plenty
ERROR: cannot overwrite active tape DailySet101
it should be conceptually fairly easy to add krb5 (hopefully gssapi,
actually) code to parallel the krb4 support. the hard part is that
there can be more than one enctype, but we could force 3des. gsswrap
will be unusable due to the err interesting scheme the krb4 stuff
uses.
--
Greg Tr
On Wednesday 28 January 2004 16:22, Georg Rehfeld wrote:
>Hi,
Thanks Georg. Someone else had explained it to me also, but this a
actually a bit clearer an explanation, thanks.
>though the question is fairly old I found the answer just now:
>
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>> I've got a silly Q myself over
--On Wednesday, January 28, 2004 13:52:10 +0100 Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to backup the machine u07 from u07 (the one with the tape drive).
>
> I'm getting a
>
> ash-2.00$ amcheck daily
> Amanda Tape Server Host Check
> -
> Holding disk /Disk
16 matches
Mail list logo