--On Friday, February 13, 2004 22:48:36 -0600 Fran Fabrizio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have figured out the problem. The index for this problem filesystem (/www) has
> 99.999% of its entries preceeded by a string of numbers, like:
>
> 10010135161/./www/httpd/htdocs/info/mrmsd/cgi-bin
I have figured out the problem. The index for this problem filesystem
(/www) has 99.999% of its entries preceeded by a string of numbers, like:
10010135161/./www/httpd/htdocs/info/mrmsd/cgi-bin/source.C_mainly.d/c/backup/1997102919_nph-sss.c.gz
10010134067/./sol8/pack.d/netscape_patches/1085
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 08:31:03AM -0900, Kevin S Secor wrote:
> sorry bout that the OS is sol 9
Great. So the only caveat here is that I've never personally run
MTX/sgen on a fibre-connected robot. No reason that shouldn't be
totally transparent (just like the tape drives themselves), I've just
Yeah, something else is going on... the file was never deleted, it's
still there, I just accidentally blew over the new version with the old.
Yes, it defaults to today if you don't explicitly set the date, and
the file was definitely there today (and every day before it for many,
many months),
--On Friday, February 13, 2004 16:13:10 -0600 Fran Fabrizio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am trying to restore a file from my web document root. This is an area that's
> been very static (except for today when I blew on top of something I shouldn't have
> :-) I went to run amrecover, and i
And a bit more information (sorry, should have debugged more
firstagain, Friday afternoon... :-)
Two more relevant bits of infoon the Amanda server, I have looked in
the index directory for this client, and it did a level 0 on the 10th,
and the file I want is listed in that index. The
I am trying to restore a file from my web document root. This is an
area that's been very static (except for today when I blew on top of
something I shouldn't have :-) I went to run amrecover, and it's only
showing files that have changed recently. For example:
/www
/htdocs
/staticarea
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Paul Bijnens wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> in our environment there is one linux system (SuSE 8.1 amanda-2.4.4-41)
>> where amanda not increase the dump level to 2,3... I tried it with
>> different bumpsize,bumpdays and bumpmult values but the result is always
>> th
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 12:46:08PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 12:27:23PM -0500, Allen Liu --- work wrote:
> > I am not sure if this is an error in amverifyrun script.
> >
> > I run amverifyrun and got a error :
> >
> > test: argument expected.
> >
> > When I viewed the s
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 12:27:23PM -0500, Allen Liu --- work wrote:
> I am not sure if this is an error in amverifyrun script.
>
> I run amverifyrun and got a error :
>
> test: argument expected.
>
> When I viewed the script I found the 1st line is :
>
> #!/bin/sh
> while there is a test li
I backed up some windows files thru SAMBA. It looks fine for backup.
When I tried to restore them using:
amrestore
it created a file in text format on my Sol box like:
$file pe*
pete.__boat_binary.20040213.1: ascii text
How can I recover files in it to WIN machine ?
Thanks
Allen Liu
sorry bout that the OS is sol 9
- Original Message -
From: "Stefan G. Weichinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, February 13, 2004 8:13 am
Subject: Re: hardware/config question from a newbie
> Hi, Kevin,
>
> on Freitag, 13. Februar 2004 at 17:53 you wrote to amanda-users:
>
> KSS> Am
I am not sure if this is an error in amverifyrun script.
I run amverifyrun and got a error :
test: argument expected.
When I viewed the script I found the 1st line is :
#!/bin/sh
while there is a test line in body :
[ -e .. ]
This is not supported in sh. After I change 1st line to
Hi, Kevin,
on Freitag, 13. Februar 2004 at 17:53 you wrote to amanda-users:
KSS> Am looking at switching over to amanda..as the cost of
KSS> commercial software is getting out of control.
KSS>Here is the question will AMANDA work with a OVERLAND
KSS> DATA NEO 4000 tape library with 2 SDLT 320
Am looking at switching over to amanda..as the cost of commercial software is getting
out of control.
Here is the question will AMANDA work with a OVERLAND DATA NEO 4000 tape library
with 2 SDLT 320 Drives ...connected via a point to point fiber card ?
thanks
kev
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Siegerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 8:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: suggestions for a backup scheme?
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 09:37:23AM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
> > Then, have a cron job that copie
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 12:14:45PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> When people have expressed terrible concern for
> large filemarks in their measured tapetypes
> I have often said basically "don't worry".
>
> Well I think we have a new champion filemark.
>
> Just posted to the Faq-O-Matic list was:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in our environment there is one linux system (SuSE 8.1 amanda-2.4.4-41)
where amanda not increase the dump level to 2,3... I tried it with
different bumpsize,bumpdays and bumpmult values but the result is always
the same - dump level not greater than 1...Is there anyone
Hi all,
in our environment there is one linux system (SuSE 8.1 amanda-2.4.4-41) where amanda not increase the dump level to 2,3... I tried it with different bumpsize,bumpdays and bumpmult values but the result is always the same - dump level not greater than 1...Is there anyone who has experienc
Hi, Josef,
on Freitag, 13. Februar 2004 at 01:22 you wrote to amanda-users:
JW> Hello folks.
JW> I have written a script to print amanda tape labels. I think this script
JW> might be interesting to other amanda users, so I offer to include it in
JW> the amanda distribution.
JW> Any interest?
I
20 matches
Mail list logo
