Re: mixed full / incremental backup...

2004-03-11 Thread Kristian Rink
Hi Stefan et al,... ...and at first, thanks for all the input - much appreciated! :) On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:17:26 +0100 Stefan G. Weichinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wrong syntax there ... Doesn't amcheck complain ?? Not really, everything seems to be fine, though I made some

SAMBA: selfcheck request timed out. Host down?

2004-03-11 Thread Tim Krieglstein
Hi I am trying to get amanda backup from windows machines up and running, currently without any success: I have tried three hosts two windows machines and one unix box and both windows boxes fail. The log of amcheck -c looks like this: Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check

RedHat list

2004-03-11 Thread Bill Clery
Sorry, for this non-amanda question: Does anybody know if there is a good RedHat 9 users mail-list Bill

Re: SAMBA: selfcheck request timed out. Host down?

2004-03-11 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 at 1:40pm, Tim Krieglstein wrote The log of amcheck -c looks like this: Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check WARNING: snap1: selfcheck request timed out. Host down? WARNING: wins4: selfcheck request timed out. Host down? Client check: 3

Re: RedHat list

2004-03-11 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 at 8:04am, Bill Clery wrote Sorry, for this non-amanda question: Does anybody know if there is a good RedHat 9 users mail-list https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list/ -- Joshua Baker-LePain Department of Biomedical Engineering Duke University

Disaster Recovery

2004-03-11 Thread todd zenker
What are the files needed for a Disaster Recovery on the backup server?? Thanks in Advance... Todd E. Zenker CNE-GSFC NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Raytheon Mailstop 200.1 http://cne.gsfc.nasa.gov https://webdrive.gsfc.nasa.gov

Re: Disaster Recovery

2004-03-11 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 at 10:43am, todd zenker wrote What are the files needed for a Disaster Recovery on the backup server?? I think what you mean is what files do you need in order to save the complete current state and history of the backups, although I'm guessing as your request was overly

Re: Disaster Recovery--- Thanks

2004-03-11 Thread todd zenker
Thanks Joshua. I figured that is what is needed in order to recover my backup server. I'm familiar with Tivoli Disaster Recovery. Thanks again. At 11:01 AM 3/11/2004, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 at 10:43am, todd zenker wrote What are the files needed for a Disaster

Re: SAMBA: selfcheck request timed out. Host down?

2004-03-11 Thread Tim Krieglstein
Hi Joshua The client in your disklist (the first column) for 'doze boxes backed up via samba needs to be a *nix box with smbclient installed. When amanda contacts the *nix box, that box will then initiate the smbclient connection to the 'doze box. Thanks for the hint. It did the trick.

retrieving 1 year old file

2004-03-11 Thread Sergio Pereira
.:-) here's my relevant configuration on amanda.conf: dumpcycle 7 daysrunspercycle 5 tapecycle 6 tapes runtapes 1 tpchanger chg-disk tapedev file:/amandavtapes (this is a entire disk) my virtual tapes are: (amtape daily show) slot 2: date 20040311 label daily2 slot 3: date 20040311 label daily3 slot

Could not get changer info

2004-03-11 Thread Pablo Quintía Vidal
When I run amcheck Diaria I get this message: amcheck-server: could not get the changer info: badly formed result from charge: "YPBINDPROC_DOMAIN: Domain not bound" And I can´t label de tapes with amlabel Diaria Diaria01 slot 1 ... The tape changer I use is "/usr/local/libexec/chg-disk"    

Re: retrieving 1 year old file

2004-03-11 Thread Frank Smith
20040311 label daily2 slot 3: date 20040311 label daily3 slot 4: date 20040311 label daily4 slot 5: date 20040311 label daily5 slot 6: date 20040310 label daily6 slot 1: date 20040311 label daily1 thx, Sergio -- Frank Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sr

Re: Disaster Recovery

2004-03-11 Thread Jonathan Dill
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: I think what you mean is what files do you need in order to save the complete current state and history of the backups, although I'm guessing as your request was overly terse. If that's right, you need: the config dirs (where your amanda.confs are) the infofile dirs

Re: retrieving 1 year old file

2004-03-11 Thread Sergio Pereira
when recovering a file/folder? just to clarify, I'm just trying to find the best way to have 1 yr of backup. Frank my virtual tapes are: (amtape daily show) slot 2: date 20040311 label daily2 slot 3: date 20040311 label daily3 slot 4: date 20040311 label daily4 slot 5: date

*Slow* amrestore

2004-03-11 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
I'm reading some somewhat large (14-18GB) images off of AIT3 tapes, and it's taking *forever*. Some crude calculations show it coming off the tape at around 80 KB/s, whereas it was written out at 11701.6 KB/s. The tapes were written in variable block size mode. What's the best way to read

Re: *Slow* amrestore

2004-03-11 Thread Jonathan Dill
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: I'm reading some somewhat large (14-18GB) images off of AIT3 tapes, and it's taking *forever*. Some crude calculations show it coming off the tape at around 80 KB/s, whereas it was written out at 11701.6 KB/s. The tapes were written in variable block size mode.

Re: *Slow* amrestore

2004-03-11 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 at 2:21pm, Jonathan Dill wrote I would try amrestore -c to just dump the image off the tape, and then do the uncompress and extraction separately, but you will need enough disk space to do it. Worst case, you could try amrestore -r and use dd bs=32k skip=1 if=dump-file

Re: *Slow* amrestore

2004-03-11 Thread Antoine Reid
--On Thursday, March 11, 2004 2:30 PM -0500 Joshua Baker-LePain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Maybe I should try dd with bs=16M? But will that pad the output file with an unacceptable-to-tar chunk at the end since the tapefile is unlikely to be an exact multiple of 16M? In my experience,

Re: *Slow* amrestore

2004-03-11 Thread Jonathan Dill
Hmm. Check also mt status to make sure the drive thinks that the blocksize is 0 if not change it with mt blksize. The files will be perfectly fine with bs=16M. gzip and/or tar will probably give a warning bitching about the nulls at the end, but it won't have any effect on the restore, the

Re: *Slow* amrestore

2004-03-11 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 at 8:34pm, Gerhard den Hollander wrote I am assuming the disk you are writing to, the machine the tape drive is attached to and the machine on which the amrestore is running are all the same ? Yep. If not, your network might be the bottleneck. I was originally doing

Re: *Slow* amrestore

2004-03-11 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 at 2:52pm, Jonathan Dill wrote Hmm. Check also mt status to make sure the drive thinks that the blocksize is 0 if not change it with mt blksize. The files will be perfectly fine with bs=16M. gzip and/or tar will probably give a warning bitching about the nulls at the

Re: retrieving 1 year old file

2004-03-11 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 01:54:19PM -0500, Sergio Pereira wrote: On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 12:11, Frank Smith wrote: --On Thursday, March 11, 2004 11:46:16 -0500 Sergio Pereira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi list, I'm starting to play win amanda (2.4.4p2) on rh9 and using external hard

Re: *Slow* amrestore

2004-03-11 Thread Jonathan Dill
Have you taken a look around in /proc/scsi? /proc/scsi/scsi should give you some basic information, and the subdir for your driver should give more details, such as what transfer rate the drive is negotatiated at, for example /proc/scsi/aic7xxx/0 for an Adaptec 2940 series. Perhaps there was

Re: *Slow* amrestore

2004-03-11 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 03:29:23PM -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: But 4M works. ?? And to add insult to injury, that's going at about 70K/s. What about our old oft occuring observations on scsi devices, Writing through that cable uses different wires than reading. -- Jon H.

Re: *Slow* amrestore

2004-03-11 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 at 4:08pm, Jon LaBadie wrote On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 03:29:23PM -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: But 4M works. ?? And to add insult to injury, that's going at about 70K/s. What about our old oft occuring observations on scsi devices, But isn't 1 goat/week

scsi-changer debugging...

2004-03-11 Thread Kristian Rink
Hi all,... ...after still having some weird issues with my backup runs not running as expected (scheduled) running chg-scsi, I was playing around with the debug files a little, and here's the result (see attached: scsidebug): basically, after START SCSI_LoadUnload, messages like ---snip---