Hi,
i' m trying to label a tape with the command
amlabel -f "config" "string" and the answer is "amlabel: could not load
tapelis "PATH_TO_TAPELIST"
i' ve tried with an empty tapelist file , without tapelist file and
with a tapelist file with only ste "string" ; also in my amanda.conf
file as
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 12:41:04PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> i' m trying to label a tape with the command
> amlabel -f "config" "string" and the answer is "amlabel: could not load
> tapelis "PATH_TO_TAPELIST"
>i' ve tried with an empty tapelist file , without tapelist file and
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004, Gene Heskett wrote:
> And one other minor detail should be mentioned, Jon. Some, but not
> all linux distributions disable the multiple lun scsi bus scans in
> order to speed up the boot process. Co-incidentally, some changers
> have their robot mechanisms located at the sa
Environment: amanda 2.4.4p2 client being installed on 2.4.9-31
Server (on Solaris) has been running for years, client is new.
Symptom:
Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
ERROR: mssarc: [could not access /dev/sda12 (/iarc/vol): Permission denied]
Client check: 10 h
--On Monday, October 04, 2004 11:31:08 -0400 Brian Cuttler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Environment: amanda 2.4.4p2 client being installed on 2.4.9-31
>
> Server (on Solaris) has been running for years, client is new.
>
> Symptom:
> Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
>
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 at 11:31am, Brian Cuttler wrote
> Environment: amanda 2.4.4p2 client being installed on 2.4.9-31
Whatever version of RH that is, the kernel is rather out of data (which
means probably a lot of other packages as well). I'd upgrade it ASAP.
> Server (on Solaris) has been runni
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 11:31:08AM -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
> ERROR: mssarc: [could not access /dev/sda12 (/iarc/vol): Permission denied]
What are mssarc and /iarc/vol? They make me wonder whether this
is indeed a locally connected disk. If it isn't, there are other
factors you haven't mentio
Here's a summary of the situation: we have Server 1 and Server 2. Server
1 is the tape backup server, Server 2 is a 'jack of all trades' backup
server for the Servers 1-x (is case of catastrophic failure, Server 2 can
be booted up to take the place of Server X, has configs for all other
server
Hello,
I am new to
amanda and after a slow-going process (not all directly from Amanda,
some was in first getting MTX to work, etc) I have it mostly working (for
one machine, have to add clients to other boxes yet...). (IE: It would be
nice if the install script was a little more us
What version of RH is this? I may have missed it in my reading. I noted the
Kernel version but curious on the version. Also what does your
amandad.*.debug messages say? Can you copy/paste them to the group to see
how it was installed? This is on the client of course, also how about your
disklist ho
Good questions all...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# more redhat-release
Red Hat Linux release 7.2 (Enigma)
An upgrade really isn't an option - this is a turn-key OCR system.
We are moving to amanda here since we've been unable to move enough
data to the local tape drive to backup the system, it is cu
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 11:16:42AM -0600, Daniel Bentley wrote:
> Here's a summary of the situation: we have Server 1 and Server 2. Server
> 1 is the tape backup server, Server 2 is a 'jack of all trades' backup
> server for the Servers 1-x (is case of catastrophic failure, Server 2 can
> be bo
--On Monday, October 04, 2004 13:20:32 -0400 "Lauro, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am new to amanda and after a slow-going process (not all directly
> from Amanda, some was in first getting MTX to work, etc) I have it
> mostly working (for one machine, have to add clients
Does your disklist look something like below? These are in my
/etc/amanda/DailySet1/disklist file.
nnewton.wadsworth.org /dev/sda12 always-full -1 local
Here is what my xinetd.d config files look like on a Redhat 9.0 system. Hope
this helps, note on my RH 9.0 system in my /etc/pa
On Monday 04 October 2004 06:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi,
> i' m trying to label a tape with the command
> amlabel -f "config" "string" and the answer is "amlabel: could not
> load tapelis "PATH_TO_TAPELIST"
> i' ve tried with an empty tapelist file , without tapelist file
> and with a tape
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 07:02:01PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 04 October 2004 06:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Hi,
> > i' m trying to label a tape with the command
> > amlabel -f "config" "string" and the answer is "amlabel: could not
> > load tapelis "PATH_TO_TAPELIST"
> > i' ve t
16 matches
Mail list logo
